{"id":42309,"date":"2014-03-10T12:00:26","date_gmt":"2014-03-10T17:00:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=42309"},"modified":"2014-03-10T08:00:39","modified_gmt":"2014-03-10T13:00:39","slug":"all-those-jazzy-terms","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=42309","title":{"rendered":"All Those &#8220;Jazzy Terms&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In Minnesota, if you are\u00a0<em>accused\u00a0<\/em>of a drug-related crime <em>but not convicted<\/em>, you can lose any property that\u00a0<em>the police and prosecutors\u00a0<\/em>say was used for the crime.<\/p>\n<p>Seems prone to abuse to you?<\/p>\n<p>It does to a lot of people. \u00a0There&#8217;s a bill to try to fix that in the Legislature &#8211; to require\u00a0<em>convictions\u00a0<\/em>before forfeiting property.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s getting flak from &#8220;Law Enforcement&#8221; and &#8220;Prosecutors&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Guess why (emphasis added)?<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family: Georgia, 'Bitstream Charter', serif; font-style: italic;\">Backers say the state\u2019s civil forfeiture laws are long overdue for a little due process. <strong>The laws have become a growing source of cash for law enforcement agencies<\/strong> and were famously abused by the now-defunct Metro Gang Strike Force, which paid out $840,000 in settlements to \u00advictims who had their property illegally seized.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I suspect if you asked a whooooole lot of people on the street what the standard was, they&#8217;d say &#8220;conviction&#8221;. \u00a0They&#8217;d be wrong.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Under current law, police or sheriffs can keep property, vehicles and cash seized in drug cases or drive-by shootings \u2014 regardless of the outcome of the criminal case. If a suspect is found not guilty, they can still lose their property in civil court unless they can prove it was not involved in a crime. The bill would require prosecutors to return the property if there is no criminal conviction associated with the seizure.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And when I explain this to people who don&#8217;t follow these sorts of things, they&#8217;re non-plussed. \u00a0Then, frequently, upset; you&#8217;re not actually &#8220;innocent until proven guilty&#8221;:<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>\u00a0You have a kid who starts dealing a little weed? \u00a0And he gets on the County Attorney&#8217;s radar to the point where the prosecutor decides to try to squeeze him and those close to him to get to someone else?<\/p>\n<p>Adios, property.<\/p>\n<p>But it&#8217;s for the children. \u00a0Er, I mean, for law enforcement!<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family: Georgia, 'Bitstream Charter', serif; font-style: italic;\">Lee McGrath, executive director of the Institute for Justice\u2019s \u00adMinnesota chapter, said that between 2003 and 2010, law enforcement agencies supplemented their budgets with $30 million gained through forfeitures. <strong>That, McGrath said, represents a 75 percent increase despite a small drop in the crime rate<\/strong>. The bill has received broad bipartisan support.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And who opposes the bill?<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"font-family: Georgia, 'Bitstream Charter', serif; font-style: italic;\">[County Attorneys Association] Executive Director John Kingrey said his organization supports fairness and transparency in the state\u2019s forfeiture laws, but that the bill is ripe for abuse.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u201cDrug dealers are smart people,\u201d Kingrey said. \u201cOne of the challenges we have is we walk in the door with cocaine and $10,000 sitting on the table, with five guys saying \u2018That\u2019s not mine.\u2019 Four of them get convicted, and the fifth guy says \u2018That money was mine, I wasn\u2019t convicted, give me the dough.\u2019\u2009\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Good heavens. \u00a0That might require the county attorneys to\u00a0<em>do their jobs<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m going to emphasize this next bit:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>It\u2019s not just money, Kingrey said. Acquittals could also put guns back on the street<\/strong>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Does anyone need to have this translated? \u00a0<strong>&#8220;Being found not guilty of a crime means people might get their property back?&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Anyway &#8211; they&#8217;re all lawyers, so the truth will be found under many interlocking layers of bullshit. \u00a0And here it is:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u201cConviction is a very jazzy term, but it\u2019s more nuanced,\u201d Kingrey said.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;Conviction&#8221; may be jazzy.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Innocent until proven guilty&#8221; is an AC\/DC riff, plain and loud and unadorned and unmistakeable. \u00a0No conviction, no forfeiture.<\/p>\n<p>Cut the weasel words, County Attorneys. \u00a0You&#8217;re running a licence to print money, and you don&#8217;t want the peasants to mess with a good thing.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Minnesota, if you are\u00a0accused\u00a0of a drug-related crime but not convicted, you can lose any property that\u00a0the police and prosecutors\u00a0say was used for the crime. Seems prone to abuse to you? It does to a lot of people. \u00a0There&#8217;s a bill to try to fix that in the Legislature &#8211; to require\u00a0convictions\u00a0before forfeiting property. It&#8217;s [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,256,30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-42309","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-crime-and-punishment","category-fourth-amendment","category-liberty"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42309","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=42309"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42309\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":42319,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42309\/revisions\/42319"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=42309"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=42309"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=42309"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}