{"id":39259,"date":"2013-10-25T06:00:53","date_gmt":"2013-10-25T11:00:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=39259"},"modified":"2013-10-24T06:40:13","modified_gmt":"2013-10-24T11:40:13","slug":"a-nation-of-pathologies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=39259","title":{"rendered":"A Nation Of Pathologies"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>One in 11 American children is diagnosed &#8211; or &#8220;diagnosed&#8221; &#8211; with ADHD in one form or another.<\/p>\n<p>In France, the rate is one out of 200.<\/p>\n<p>Why?<\/p>\n<p>Here in the US, ADHD is considered a biological disorder with biological causes &#8211; although as with so many &#8220;biological&#8221; emotional and mental disorders, nobody has actually empirically found that cause yet.<\/p>\n<p>In France, it&#8217;s another story:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>French child psychiatrists, on the other hand, view ADHD as a medical condition that has psycho-social and situational causes. Instead of treating children&#8217;s focusing and behavioral problems with drugs, French doctors prefer to look for the underlying issue that is causing the child distress\u2014not in the child&#8217;s brain but in the child&#8217;s social context. They then choose to treat the underlying social context problem with psychotherapy or family counseling. This is a very different way of seeing things from the American tendency to attribute all symptoms to a biological dysfunction such as a chemical imbalance in the child&#8217;s brain.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Georgia, 'Bitstream Charter', serif; font-style: italic;\">\u00a0<\/span>French child psychiatrists don&#8217;t use the same system of classification of childhood emotional problems as American psychiatrists. They do not use the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or DSM. According to Sociologist Manuel Vallee, the French Federation of Psychiatry developed an alternative classification system as a resistance to the influence of the DSM-3. This alternative was the CFTMEA (Classification Fran\u00e7aise des Troubles Mentaux de L&#8217;Enfant et de L&#8217;Adolescent), first released in 1983, and updated in 1988 and 2000. The focus of CFTMEA is on identifying and addressing the underlying psychosocial causes of children&#8217;s symptoms, not on finding the best pharmacological bandaids with which to mask symptoms.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>DSM vs. CFTMEA = Tomayto \/ Tomahto? \u00a0Perhaps.<\/p>\n<p>But for whatever reasons, ADHD isn&#8217;t an epidemic in France:<span style=\"font-family: Georgia, 'Bitstream Charter', serif; font-style: italic;\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>To the extent that French clinicians are successful at finding and repairing what has gone awry in the child&#8217;s social context, fewer children qualify for the ADHD diagnosis. Moreover, the definition of ADHD is not as broad as in the American system, which, in my view, tends to &#8220;pathologize&#8221; much of what is normal childhood behavior. The DSM specifically does not consider underlying causes. It thus leads clinicians to give the ADHD diagnosis to a much larger number of symptomatic children, while also encouraging them to treat those children with pharmaceuticals.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Also, I&#8217;m going to take a wild guess here and assume that the French system leaves the diagnosing to actual medical and mental health practicioners, and not teachers with BAs from the French equivalent of Mankato State.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One in 11 American children is diagnosed &#8211; or &#8220;diagnosed&#8221; &#8211; with ADHD in one form or another. In France, the rate is one out of 200. Why? Here in the US, ADHD is considered a biological disorder with biological causes &#8211; although as with so many &#8220;biological&#8221; emotional and mental disorders, nobody has actually [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[49],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-39259","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-science"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39259","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=39259"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39259\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":39260,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/39259\/revisions\/39260"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=39259"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=39259"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=39259"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}