{"id":3695,"date":"2008-11-25T13:08:40","date_gmt":"2008-11-25T18:08:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=3695"},"modified":"2008-11-25T13:08:40","modified_gmt":"2008-11-25T18:08:40","slug":"whos-your-second-choice-obammy-er-mr-president-elect-sir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=3695","title":{"rendered":"Who&#8217;s Your <i>Second<\/i> Choice Obammy? -er Mr. President-Elect, Sir."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Bill Clinton?<\/p>\n<p>Obama&#8217;s would-be choice for SecState tells us a bit about his confidence and demeanor. It tells us he no less lacks a capacity for leadership and change than he did before he decided to run for high office. So much for the &#8220;team of rivals.&#8221; So much for change for that matter.<\/p>\n<p>And, to boot, it would appear all the media fuss about Hillary as SecState may be for naught.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8230;it&#8217;s difficult to see Sen. Clinton achieving confirmation unless our elected  representatives are ready to ask a few questions about conflict of interest  along similar lines. And how can they not? The last time that Clinton  foreign-policy associations came up for congressional review, the investigations  ended in a cloud of murk that still has not been dispelled. Former President  Bill Clinton has recently and rather disingenuously offered to submit his own  foundation to scrutiny&#8230;, but the real problem is otherwise. Both President and Sen.  Clinton, while in office, made it obvious to foreign powers that they and their  relatives were wide open to suggestions from lobbyists and middlemen.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Ah, but is that enough in this soon-to-be rarified era of Liberal <strike>lunacy<\/strike> control of the White House and The Hill?<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In matters of foreign policy, it has been proved time and again, the Clintons  are devoted to no interest other than their own. A president absolutely has to  know of his chief foreign-policy executive that he or she has no other agenda  than the one he has set. Who can say with a straight face that this is true of a  woman whose personal ambition is without limit; whose second loyalty is to an  impeached and disbarred and discredited former president; and who is ready at  any moment, and on government time, to take a wheedling call from either of her  bulbous brothers? This is also the unscrupulous female who until recently was  willing to play the race card on President-elect Obama and (in spite of her own  complete want of any foreign-policy qualifications) to ridicule him for lacking  what she only knew about by way of sordid backstairs dealing.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/id\/2205323\/\">Read the whole article<\/a> and behold a laundry list of why Hillary Clinton should not be in public office let alone representing us to the world.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bill Clinton? Obama&#8217;s would-be choice for SecState tells us a bit about his confidence and demeanor. It tells us he no less lacks a capacity for leadership and change than he did before he decided to run for high office. So much for the &#8220;team of rivals.&#8221; So much for change for that matter. And, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":228,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20,64],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3695","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-democrats","category-president-obama"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3695","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/228"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3695"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3695\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3695"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3695"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3695"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}