{"id":3660,"date":"2008-11-18T06:15:26","date_gmt":"2008-11-18T11:15:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=3660"},"modified":"2008-11-18T06:15:26","modified_gmt":"2008-11-18T11:15:26","slug":"in-case-the-stribs-editorial-board-is-listening","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=3660","title":{"rendered":"In Case The Strib&#8217;s Editorial Board Is Listening"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There might still be a future for newspapers, <a href=\"http:\/\/news.cnet.com\/8301-10787_3-10098194-60.html\">says Rupert Murdoch<\/a>\u00a0&#8211; provided they can quit condescending their readers.<\/p>\n<p>I put the over\/under at &#8220;10% chance&#8221;:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>With newspapers cutting back and predictions of even worse times ahead, Rupert Murdoch said the profession may still have a bright future if it can shake free of reporters and editors who he said have forfeited the trust and loyalty of their readers.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;My summary of the way some of the established media has responded to the internet is this: it&#8217;s not newspapers that might become obsolete. It&#8217;s some of the editors, reporters, and proprietors who are forgetting a newspaper&#8217;s most precious asset: the bond with its readers,&#8221; said Murdoch, the chairman and chief executive officer of News Corp. He made his remarks as part of a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.abc.net.au\/corp\/pubs\/media\/s2258313.htm\"><strong><font color=\"#1e5b7e\">lecture series<\/font><\/strong><\/a> sponsored by the Australian Broadcast Corporation.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The problem?<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Murdoch, whose company&#8217;s holdings also include MySpace and the Wall Street Journal, criticized what he described as a culture of &#8220;complacency and condescension&#8221; in some newsrooms.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Complacency hits all different kinds of businesses.\u00a0 But &#8220;journalism&#8221; is almost unique in that it engenders a kind of preening condescenscion toward &#8220;outsiders&#8221;, AKA &#8220;the consumer&#8221;, the kind of thing you see in bad doctors and worse police departments and all sorts of businesses that have death wishes.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>To make his point, Murdoch criticized the media reaction after bloggers <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/articles\/A35531-2004Sep20.html\"><strong><font color=\"#1e5b7e\">debunked <\/font><\/strong><\/a>a &#8220;60 Minutes&#8221; report by former CBS anchor, Dan Rather, that President Bush had evaded service during his days in the National Guard.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Far from celebrating this citizen journalism, the establishment media reacted defensively. During an appearance on Fox News, a CBS executive attacked the bloggers in a statement that will go down in the annals of arrogance. &#8217;60 Minutes,&#8217; he said, was a professional organization with &#8216;multiple layers of checks and balances.&#8217; By contrast, he dismissed the blogger as &#8216;a guy sitting in his living room in his pajamas writing.&#8217; But eventually it was the guys sitting in their pajamas who forced Mr. Rather and his producer to resign.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Mr. Rather and his defenders are not alone,&#8221; he continued. &#8220;A recent American study reported that many editors and reporters simply do not trust their readers to make good decisions. Let&#8217;s be clear about what this means. This is a polite way of saying that these editors and reporters think their readers are too stupid to think for themselves.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The <em>Strib<\/em> is worse than most; not only are we peasants too stupid to think for ourselves, they send Lori Sturdevant and Nick Coleman to do our thinking for us.<\/p>\n<p><em>That&#8217;s <\/em>a slap.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There might still be a future for newspapers, says Rupert Murdoch\u00a0&#8211; provided they can quit condescending their readers. I put the over\/under at &#8220;10% chance&#8221;: With newspapers cutting back and predictions of even worse times ahead, Rupert Murdoch said the profession may still have a bright future if it can shake free of reporters and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3660","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-media"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3660","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3660"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3660\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3660"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3660"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3660"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}