{"id":35332,"date":"2013-03-21T13:05:40","date_gmt":"2013-03-21T18:05:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=35332"},"modified":"2013-03-21T13:05:40","modified_gmt":"2013-03-21T18:05:40","slug":"purple-bribe","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=35332","title":{"rendered":"Purple Bribe"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Upon further review &#8211; the Minnesota Vikings spent a fortune to acquire their new stadium.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/mrdilettante.blogspot.com\/2012\/11\/back-to-vaseline-dome.html\">Vaseline Dome<\/a> has re-entered the media picture in the last few weeks, as new concerns have been raised about the viability of the electronic pull-tab funding mechanism which has fallen <a href=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=35264\">$13.2 million short of yearly estimates<\/a>. \u00a0Or more accurately, completely fallen apart since the State had expected the pull-tabs to generate $15 million a year, putting the threat of needing general funds to finance a luxury item back on the table.<\/p>\n<p>Flawed or not, the stadium financing figures aren&#8217;t the only numbers that have come to light in recent weeks. \u00a0We now know how much Zygi Wilf and company spent in their multi-year lobbying effort to build a stadium in the exact same location as their current home &#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/minnesota.publicradio.org\/collections\/special\/columns\/polinaut\/archive\/2013\/03\/business_education_top_lobbying_money_list.shtml\">$4,270,000<\/a>.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_35333\" style=\"width: 499px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?attachment_id=35333\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-35333\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-35333\" class=\"size-full wp-image-35333\" title=\"graph\" src=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/graph.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"489\" height=\"322\" srcset=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/graph.jpg 489w, http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/graph-300x197.jpg 300w, http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/03\/graph-455x300.jpg 455w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 489px) 100vw, 489px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-35333\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Via MPR&#8217;s Capitol View and Paul Tosto<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The Vikings were the 6th largest lobbyist group (by dollars spent) in the last six years. \u00a0And while the $610,000 spent last year as the stadium was finally approved was a drop in the bucket of the estimated <a href=\"http:\/\/www.twincities.com\/politics\/ci_22833536\/minnesota-politics-54-million-spent-lobbying-state-2012?source=rss\">$54 million spent by all lobbyist groups in 2012<\/a>, the $1.5 million used by the Vikings during 2011-12 would have made them the 3rd largest lobbyist of the cycle. Even lobbying powerhouse Education Minnesota spent slightly less at the Capitol in that period. \u00a0Purple pride indeed.<\/p>\n<p>$4.2 million for $975 million is a tremendous value (although the Vikings spent millions more in stadium-related advertising). \u00a0But the end product may not look like such a deal if the financing structure collapses in on itself. \u00a0Which begs the question &#8211; what happens when the State finally admits the <a href=\"http:\/\/espn.go.com\/blog\/nflnation\/post\/_\/id\/73297\/vikings-stadium-if-funding-falls-short\">pull-tab solution isn&#8217;t working?<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The state&#8217;s $498 million share of the $975 million project is to be paid for through sales of electronic pull-tabs. But the final two pages of the stadium bill provide for two &#8220;blink-on&#8221; funding provisions as backups. The first is an NFL-themed lottery and the second, if necessary, is a 10 percent tax on luxury suites.<\/p>\n<p>And what of the doomsday scenario, where all three provisions fall short of the money required for the state&#8217;s annual payments? At that point, from what I can tell, the state would have to produce money from its general fund &#8212; something Gov. Mark Dayton promised not to do when campaigning for the facility.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Would either of these other solutions generate the revenue necessary? \u00a0A Vikings-themed lotto doesn&#8217;t sound fundamentally different than the pull-tab concept. \u00a0The Minnesota Lottery brought in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mnlottery.com\/news__info\/where_the_money_goes\/\">$123 million in profit<\/a> last year, but that&#8217;s among <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mnlottery.com\/games\/\">9 different games<\/a>. \u00a0A 10th lotto isn&#8217;t likely to expand the number of people playing, only shrink the total amount left that would otherwise go into the State&#8217;s coffers. \u00a0Besides, over 70% of the funds generated by the lottery go either to paying winners or towards lottery administration.<\/p>\n<p>The most likely end game for the Vikings stadium financing shell game lies within the 10% luxury suite tax. \u00a0Current suite rental prices aren&#8217;t terrible by NFL standards, running around <a href=\"http:\/\/www.eventusa.com\/vikings\/Minnesota_Viking%20_skyboxes.html\">$15,000 to $26,000 a game<\/a>. \u00a0Slapping another $1,500 or $2,000 is unlikely to cause any corporation to abandon their suite, but certainly won&#8217;t make the Vikings happy as they compute what to charge going forward.<\/p>\n<p>The only real problem with the luxury tax idea is that it was envisioned as a last-gasp measure, meant to fill in a minor funding short-fall &#8211; not the State&#8217;s entire share. \u00a0If the Vikings lotto goes the way of the pull-tab, that&#8217;s precisely what the tax will become. \u00a0And if that occurs, the political football of using general funds will be kicked right at Mark Dayton&#8217;s 2014 prospects.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Upon further review &#8211; the Minnesota Vikings spent a fortune to acquire their new stadium. The Vaseline Dome has re-entered the media picture in the last few weeks, as new concerns have been raised about the viability of the electronic pull-tab funding mechanism which has fallen $13.2 million short of yearly estimates. \u00a0Or more accurately, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":425,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[121,105,2,59,77],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35332","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-campaign-14","category-first-ringer","category-minnesota-politics","category-pork-patrol","category-the-rare-sports-post"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35332","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/425"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=35332"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35332\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":35335,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35332\/revisions\/35335"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=35332"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=35332"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=35332"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}