{"id":310,"date":"2007-01-10T07:16:39","date_gmt":"2007-01-10T13:16:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php\/2007\/01\/10\/monastery-changes-monks-upset\/"},"modified":"2011-09-01T07:53:45","modified_gmt":"2011-09-01T12:53:45","slug":"monastery-changes-monks-upset","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=310","title":{"rendered":"Monastery Changes:  Monks Upset"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The City Pages&#8217; Britt Robson <a href=\"http:\/\/citypages.com\/databank\/28\/1362\/article15055.asp\">interviews a range of Strib staffers<\/a> on their reactions to the paper&#8217;s recent sale.<\/p>\n<p>Rochelle Olson &#8211; she of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/archives\/008001.html\">the piece<\/a> on Alan Fine&#8217;s domestic abuse arrest which, for space reasons, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/archives\/008040.html\">neglected to mention<\/a> the salient facts of the arrest&#8217;s expungement, the lack of any physical evidence against Fine, or later convictions against Fine&#8217;s soon-to-be ex that one might expect would give the reader a complete picture of the case &#8211; notes:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;There is enough anger to go around, but from what I hear, it is mainly directed at Pruitt and Anders,&#8221; says [Olson], a metro reporter who has worked at the paper for seven years. &#8220;There&#8217;s a lot of derisive talk about Pruitt, because he was painted in other media as the golden boy, this tanned San Franciscan up-and-comer who liked rock and roll music and talked about a new paradigm. He and Anders led people to believe they cared about journalism. And when push came to shove, all they cared about was the bottom line.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It might explain the key facts being left out of the Fine piece; people were too busy provisioning their lifeboats.<\/p>\n<p>Well, it&#8217;s more palatable than &#8220;all parties involved were in the bag for Keith Ellison&#8221;, isn&#8217;t it?<\/p>\n<p>There are, though, a couple of interesting quotes; I&#8217;ll add the emphases.  First, reporter Mike Kaszuba:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;We need to squeeze out another 10 years to stay in this industry. And you sit back and say, wow, I wonder if there is another 10 years left in this industry<em>? We are the Watergate babies, from back when it was cool and sexy to be a journalist<\/em>. We were naive, goofy idealists in a way. Now it is about dollars and cents. The thing I got into it for, I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s even among the top five reasons this place runs anymore.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And Biz beat reporter Mike Meyers:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I didn&#8217;t go into this job to retire at 50 or to make a fortune. I did it because I liked it and I enjoyed the work. <em>It is a calling<\/em>. And over time, it has become more and more of a regular job where you show up do your job and leave.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I remember going into radio, and staying in it for years after I should have left, because it was cool and sexy (and, lest I forget, because I loved doing the job, most of it).  I never had the baggage of a &#8220;calling&#8221;, although with talk radio I had the impediment of it being the first serious love of my life, which is similar, I think.<\/p>\n<p>And I remember the realization; the world doesn&#8217;t have to fund my fun, to say nothing of my love.  And anyone who follows a &#8220;calling&#8221; has to accept the notion that not everyone will support it; just monks are dependent on the largesse of a church or institution, newspaper reporters with a &#8220;calling&#8221; are dependent on the world valuing that calling sufficiently to keep them, or some number of them, employed.<\/p>\n<p>So why <em>has <\/em>that calling been so devalued in the past 20 years?<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;d have loved to have heard the answers Britt Robson got to <em>that <\/em>question.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The City Pages&#8217; Britt Robson interviews a range of Strib staffers on their reactions to the paper&#8217;s recent sale. Rochelle Olson &#8211; she of the piece on Alan Fine&#8217;s domestic abuse arrest which, for space reasons, neglected to mention the salient facts of the arrest&#8217;s expungement, the lack of any physical evidence against Fine, or [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-310","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-media"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=310"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22421,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310\/revisions\/22421"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=310"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=310"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=310"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}