{"id":30955,"date":"2012-10-09T07:30:55","date_gmt":"2012-10-09T12:30:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=30955"},"modified":"2012-10-09T07:47:15","modified_gmt":"2012-10-09T12:47:15","slug":"chanting-points-memo-and-were-back-to-the-fine-print","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=30955","title":{"rendered":"Chanting Points Memo: And We’re Back To The Fine Print"},"content":{"rendered":"

The left and media (PTR) was skipping and gamboling about like happy little meerkats yesterday; a new PPP poll showed – as PPP polls tend to do –\u00a0nothing but good news for Minnesota Democrats<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

In an automated phone survey of 937 likely MInnesota voters, they found…:<\/p>\n

PPP’s newest poll on Minnesota’s amendment to ban gay marriage finds it running slightly behind, with 46% of voters planning to support it and 49% opposed.<\/p>\n

That represents a 4 point shift compared to a month ago when it led for passage 48-47.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The poll claims that the major movement has been among indies and women.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe marriage amendment in Minnesota continues to look like a toss up,\u201d said Dean Debnam, President of Public Policy Polling. \u201cVoters are very closely divided on the<\/p>\n

issue.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Well, we more or less knew that.<\/p>\n

Then, they addressed the other Constitutional Amendment:<\/p>\n

When we polled on it in June it was leading for passage by a 58\/34 margin. By September that had tightened to a 56\/39 advantage. And now it’s leading only 51\/43. Democrats are now even more opposed to the voter ID amendment (23\/71) than they are to the one on<\/p>\n

marriage. And although independents continue to support it their 52\/41 favor for it is down a good deal from 62\/33 a month ago. This fight may end up a lot closer than people<\/p>\n

initially expected.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Or it may not.<\/p>\n

We’ll come back to that one.<\/p>\n

They also put the DFL up substantially on a “generic legislative ballot”, which would be big news if voters voted for a generic legislature. \u00a0They don’t, of course.<\/p>\n

As always, the devil is in the turnout model:<\/p>\n

Here it is, buried deep in a set of crosstabs<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

That’s D+9. \u00a0Not as far out as the D+13 we got from the\u00a0Strib\u00a0<\/em>a while back, but it still higher than 2008.<\/p>\n

That’s especially interesting compared to this other bit of crosstabbery\"\"<\/a>:<\/p>\n

So Democrats outnumber Republicans 38\/29, but conservatives outnumber Dems 37\/34?<\/p>\n

At any rate – the polling services continue to put out (if you look hard enough for them) polls with turnout models that, when you ask them, they are are legitimately what they’re encountering out there…<\/p>\n

…but do not in any way pass the sniff test.<\/p>\n

And the media?<\/p>\n

Well, they just shovel it on out there. \u00a0It’s just the topline number that really matters. \u00a0Right?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The left and media (PTR) was skipping and gamboling about like happy little meerkats yesterday; a new PPP poll showed – as PPP polls tend to do –\u00a0nothing but good news for Minnesota Democrats. In an automated phone survey of 937 likely MInnesota voters, they found…: PPP’s newest poll on Minnesota’s amendment to ban gay […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[56,125],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30955","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-campaign-12","category-the-great-poll-scam"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30955","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=30955"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30955\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30960,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30955\/revisions\/30960"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=30955"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=30955"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=30955"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}