{"id":28381,"date":"2012-06-06T08:09:15","date_gmt":"2012-06-06T13:09:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=28381"},"modified":"2012-06-06T08:09:15","modified_gmt":"2012-06-06T13:09:15","slug":"swirl-part-deux","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=28381","title":{"rendered":"Swirl, Part Deux"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"width: 251px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" \" title=\"jesse\" src=\"http:\/\/2.bp.blogspot.com\/-I894SU_s_g8\/Tfe-fRgkqzI\/AAAAAAAAASc\/tJlqsa9kEhk\/s1600\/jesse-ventura1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"241\" height=\"177\" \/><p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Smiling, because it&#39;s not his problem anymore<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The IP continues its independence from political relevance.<\/p>\n<p>Since &#8220;shocking the world&#8221; in 1998, the Independence\/Reform Party of Minnesota has increasingly moved into, at best, spoiler candidacy territory. \u00a0And with the close of registration for 2012 candidates in Minnesota, the spoiler party looks more than ever to be officially spoiled.<\/p>\n<p>From the party&#8217;s high-water mark of <a href=\"http:\/\/electionresults.sos.state.mn.us\/20021105\/\">47 candidates for statewide and legislative office in 2002<\/a>\u00a0(an election that included the IP&#8217;s only other election victory with St. Sen. Sheila Kiscaden), the Independence Party has seen a slow drip both in terms of quantity and quality of their candidates. \u00a0From <a href=\"http:\/\/electionresults.sos.state.mn.us\/20061107\/\">23 total candidates in 2006<\/a>, to <a href=\"http:\/\/electionresults.sos.state.mn.us\/20081104\/\">13 in 2008<\/a>\u00a0(not exactly fair to compare since fewer offices were up for election), the IP looked barren. \u00a0An uptick in <a href=\"http:\/\/electionresults.sos.state.mn.us\/20101102\/ElecMenu.asp\">2010 saw 25 candidates<\/a> &#8211;\u00a0\u00a0but the IP couldn&#8217;t even field a full slate of statewide candidates and most of the increase came from quixotic congressional bids.<\/p>\n<p>With both chambers of the legislature up for re-election and a U.S. Senate seat on the line, what did the Independence Party field for 2012? \u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/candidates.sos.state.mn.us\/CandidateFilingResults.aspx?county=0&amp;municipality=0&amp;schooldistrict=0&amp;hospitaldistrict=0&amp;level=1&amp;party=0&amp;federal=True&amp;judicial=True&amp;executive=True&amp;senate=True&amp;representative=True&amp;title=&amp;office=0&amp;candidateid=0\">15 candidates total<\/a> (actually 16, but two are competing in a US Senate primary). \u00a0Considering the number of offices on the ballot, it&#8217;s the worst recruitment class for the IP since obtaining majority party status. \u00a0It&#8217;s even smaller than their 20 candidate class of 1998 &#8211; when James Janos was considered a novelty act, not the leader of a political party.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps Mitch was right three years ago to call the IP\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=4775\">\u201cthe thing that wouldn\u2019t leave.&#8221;<\/a><\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s not hard to understand why the IP is increasingly unable to recruit candidates. \u00a0In the now nearly 14 years since Jesse Ventura&#8217;s upset victory, the party not only has no other significant victory but adamantly remains a political rorschach. \u00a0The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.independenceminnesota.org\/about-the-ip\/positions\">IP&#8217;s solutions on most of the pressing issues<\/a> remain vague as the party&#8217;s organizing principle continues to be &#8220;we&#8217;re not the other guys.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In fairness, though, it&#8217;s typically not the party infrastructure&#8217;s responsibility to define issues &#8211; that&#8217;s the job of activists and candidates. \u00a0But at its core, the IP has become a warming house for policy wonks &#8211; thinkers who want to tinker with state government. \u00a0A think tank that caucuses is noble in spirit but completely impractical in execution, or in ability to win elections.<\/p>\n<p>For 14 years, the IP\/Reform Party has refused to do the necessary grassroots work of basic party building. \u00a0Instead of recruiting city councilmen, school board officials or county commissioners to run, the IP has tried (and tried and tried) to recapture lightning in a bottle. \u00a0Armed with little infrastructure but state subsidies, it&#8217;s not hard to see the IP&#8217;s future.<\/p>\n<p>If the Ron Paul Brigades could over-run the GOP, it wouldn&#8217;t be hard for the same faction (or a similar one) to do the same to the Independence Party. \u00a0In fact, it could have happened two years ago had Joe Repya <a href=\"http:\/\/mncapitolnews.com\/node\/54\">stayed in his IP campaign for governor<\/a>. \u00a0Depending on what internal blood-letting may occur in the Grand Old Party post November as the Paul legions either dissipate or make camp, a libertarian or conservative take-over of the IP may be merely two years in the waiting.<\/p>\n<p>To the victor will go the spoils &#8211; or in this case, a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cfbreport.state.mn.us\/pdfStorage\/2010\/CampFin\/YE\/17000.pdf\">$348,000 check<\/a> from the State of Minnesota to the party&#8217;s gubernatorial candidate.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The IP continues its independence from political relevance. Since &#8220;shocking the world&#8221; in 1998, the Independence\/Reform Party of Minnesota has increasingly moved into, at best, spoiler candidacy territory. \u00a0And with the close of registration for 2012 candidates in Minnesota, the spoiler party looks more than ever to be officially spoiled. From the party&#8217;s high-water mark [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":425,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[105,2,132],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28381","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-first-ringer","category-minnesota-politics","category-mn-legislature"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28381","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/425"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=28381"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28381\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":28389,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28381\/revisions\/28389"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=28381"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=28381"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=28381"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}