{"id":27239,"date":"2012-04-03T05:34:23","date_gmt":"2012-04-03T10:34:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=27239"},"modified":"2012-04-03T05:34:23","modified_gmt":"2012-04-03T10:34:23","slug":"reframing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=27239","title":{"rendered":"Reframing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Judicial Activisim.<\/p>\n<p>To a conservative, it&#8217;s writing new law from the bench.<\/p>\n<p>To a liberal \/ neosocialist? \u00a0It&#8217;s upholding the Constitution.<\/p>\n<p>Joe Doakes from Como Park writes:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>President Obama <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/politics\/la-pn-obama-confident-supreme-court-will-uphold-healthcare-law-20120402,0,1715593.story \">said<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAnd I&#8217;d just remind conservative commentators that for years what we&#8217;ve heard is the biggest problem on the bench was judicial activism or a lack of judicial restraint. That an unelected group of people would somehow overturn a duly constituted and passed law. Well, this is a good example, and I&#8217;m pretty confident this court will recognize that and not take that step.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Judicial activism. You keep using that phrase. I don\u2019t think it means what you think it means.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Which is true. \u00a0But the real point is, just watch; this&#8217;ll be the opening salvo of an effort by the Administration, Media Matters and the left and media (ptr) to reframe &#8220;Judicial Activism&#8221; as a synonym for &#8220;Originalism&#8221;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Judicial Activisim. To a conservative, it&#8217;s writing new law from the bench. To a liberal \/ neosocialist? \u00a0It&#8217;s upholding the Constitution. Joe Doakes from Como Park writes: President Obama said: \u201cAnd I&#8217;d just remind conservative commentators that for years what we&#8217;ve heard is the biggest problem on the bench was judicial activism or a lack [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[64,51,82],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27239","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-president-obama","category-liberal-tyranny","category-scotus"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27239","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=27239"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27239\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27242,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27239\/revisions\/27242"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=27239"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=27239"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=27239"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}