{"id":2716,"date":"2008-06-16T06:03:18","date_gmt":"2008-06-16T11:03:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=2716"},"modified":"2009-12-23T13:48:15","modified_gmt":"2009-12-23T18:48:15","slug":"counting-the-minutes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=2716","title":{"rendered":"Counting The Minutes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Kevin Ecker over at True North and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.eckernet.com\/2008\/06\/two_big_scotus_cases_potentially_announced_today.html\">Eckernet <\/a>notes that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.looktruenorth.com\/liberty\/right-to-keep-and-bear-arms\/39-right-to-keep-and-bear-arms\/3456-two-big-scotus-cases-potentially-announced-today.html\">today <em>just might <\/em>be the big day<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Here is a pretty good roundup of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.concurringopinions.com\/archives\/2008\/06\/what_to_watch_f_1.html\" target=\"_blank\">what to expect from this decision<\/a>, especially since it makes the distinction between upholding the Second Amendment for a number of purposes, most notably civic and personal. The author (Mike O&#8217;Shea) is right that there is a general consensus amongst airchair justices that the Second Amendment will in all liklihood be upheld&#8230;.so the debate comes down to finer distinctions.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.looktruenorth.com\/liberty\/right-to-keep-and-bear-arms\/39-right-to-keep-and-bear-arms\/3456-two-big-scotus-cases-potentially-announced-today.html\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.looktruenorth.com\/images\/FreedomDogs\/looktruenorthsmall140.png\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>I fully expect this decision to essentially tapdance around the Miller 1939 decision, and come down in favor of private rights, leaving the argument for\/against civic uses essentially twisting in the wind. Is I wrote previously, SCOTUS made it clear from the start that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.eckernet.com\/2008\/03\/district_of_columbia_vs_heller_arrives_today.html\" target=\"_blank\">their decision would be limited to the case at hand<\/a>, which is an issue of private usage.<\/p>\n<p>Civic usage is likely to remain undecided, allowing states pretty wide latitude to ban &#8220;scary guns&#8221;. While SCOTUS, due to it&#8217;s non-elected state, is theoretically free from having to respond to public whims that may change from day to day, I don&#8217;t think most of the Justices want to come forward with a decision of essentially granting everyone the right to a howitzer.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The answer &#8211; to those of us who&#8217;ve been through this already (in my case, Minnesota&#8217;s ten-year-long battle over &#8220;shall-issue&#8221; carry permitting) is that the courts would do well to leave those decisions to the states; this is a battle that the howitzer-American community (hypothetically) needs to fight in the various legislatures.<\/p>\n<p>This case &#8211; presuming the SCOTUS decides properly &#8211; will not win &#8220;the war&#8221;.\u00a0 If <em>Heller <\/em>scuppers the District of Columbia&#8217;s racist gun ban, it&#8217;ll be analogous to getting across Omaha Beach.\u00a0 It&#8217;ll be a signal that one of the most noxious effects of the gun control spree of the sixties and seventies has been reversed. But it&#8217;ll also mean that we civil liberties supporters will have to redouble our efforts.\u00a0 We have a lot of ground yet to win, and\u00a0 it&#8217;ll have to be won the hard way; one legislator, and one voter, at a time, before we can put the last anti-gun orc to the rhetorical sword.<\/p>\n<p>I, for one, can hardly wait.<\/p>\n<blockquote \/>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kevin Ecker over at True North and Eckernet notes that today just might be the big day: Here is a pretty good roundup of what to expect from this decision, especially since it makes the distinction between upholding the Second Amendment for a number of purposes, most notably civic and personal. The author (Mike O&#8217;Shea) [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[30,82,22],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2716","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-liberty","category-scotus","category-victim-disarmament"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2716","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2716"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2716\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7434,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2716\/revisions\/7434"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2716"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2716"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2716"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}