{"id":23063,"date":"2011-09-29T06:45:02","date_gmt":"2011-09-29T11:45:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=23063"},"modified":"2011-12-07T08:26:09","modified_gmt":"2011-12-07T14:26:09","slug":"apropos-not-much-part-v","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=23063","title":{"rendered":"Apropos Not Much, Part V"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Since I started this series a couple of weeks back, we&#8217;ve enjoyed a fascinating journey of learning &#8211; in this case, about what &#8220;defamation&#8221; &#8211; libel and slander &#8211; really really mean.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.abbottlaw.com\/defamation.html\">an interesting bit<\/a>; as we noted <a href=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=23060\">yesterday<\/a>, &#8220;false&#8221; can mean either &#8220;what the defendant said is false&#8221;, or &#8220;the defendant, with reasonable care, should have <em>known <\/em>it was false&#8221;. \u00a0Indeed, the case law makes it pretty clear:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>D. Negligence Is Standard Of Liability<\/p>\n<p>In Minnesota, the defendant is liable if it &#8220;knew or should have known in the exercise of reasonable care&#8221; that the defamatory statement was false. Jadwin, supra. This is the standard formulation for liability based on negligence, that is, liability arising from failure to take due care.<\/p>\n<p>This is a low standard of liability.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In other words, if you accuse someone of having committed an infamous crime because you didn&#8217;t take the <em>reasonable <\/em>care to know that it was not factual, you are liable.<\/p>\n<p>But what about free speech?<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>However, First Amendment considerations substantially limit the application of this standard.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So the courts will err on the side of free speech if there is any way to do so.<\/p>\n<p>Still &#8211; if I were to write &#8220;Wang Fui Schlabotnik of Eden Prairie has a child porn conviction&#8221;, and Mr. Schlabotnik does not, Mr. Schlabotnik&#8217;s attorney might well argue that the First Amendment, free speech, and the rights of an open, unfettered press (in all its forms) aren&#8217;t served by my lying about his client&#8217;s criminal record &#8211; and defamation needs to be false, and false claims of infamous crimes are &#8220;defamation per se&#8221; under Minnesota Law (as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=23057\">we discussed last week<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>And I suspect he&#8217;d have a point.<\/p>\n<p>OK. \u00a0I&#8217;ll cop to it. This series on the legalities behind defamation is not <em>entirely <\/em>an academic exercise, and it&#8217;s really not <em>completely <\/em>a flight of blitheful serendipity.<\/p>\n<p>But there&#8217;s plenty of time to talk about that.<\/p>\n<p>99 weeks, to be exact.<\/p>\n<p>More later.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Since I started this series a couple of weeks back, we&#8217;ve enjoyed a fascinating journey of learning &#8211; in this case, about what &#8220;defamation&#8221; &#8211; libel and slander &#8211; really really mean. Here&#8217;s an interesting bit; as we noted yesterday, &#8220;false&#8221; can mean either &#8220;what the defendant said is false&#8221;, or &#8220;the defendant, with reasonable [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23,79],"tags":[179],"class_list":["post-23063","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-geekery","category-slander-files","tag-defamation-law"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23063","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=23063"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23063\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23175,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23063\/revisions\/23175"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=23063"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=23063"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=23063"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}