{"id":20474,"date":"2011-06-10T05:46:22","date_gmt":"2011-06-10T11:46:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=20474"},"modified":"2011-06-10T05:46:22","modified_gmt":"2011-06-10T11:46:22","slug":"disconnected-delusional-disingenuous-dayton","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=20474","title":{"rendered":"Disconnected, Delusional, Disingenuous &#8211; Dayton"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The governor <a href=\"http:\/\/www.startribune.com\/politics\/blogs\/123385508.html\">s it a freeze vetoed the K12 Education budget bill<\/a>&#8230;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In his letter vetoing the Republican K-12 budget, Dayton criticized the bill\u2019s \u201cfreezing of compensatory revenue.\u201d The state doles out that money, sometimes more than $400 million a year, based on the number of poor students in each school district.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>If you suspect that the Dayton administration&#8217;s responses to <em>every <\/em>GOP initiative were written last December, here&#8217;s your evidence:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>But there\u2019s one problem. Dayton and the Republicans both want spend the same amount on compensatory revenue over the next two years. Each side proposes leaving it at levels set in current law.<\/p>\n<p>Senate Republicans once proposed freezing compensatory revenue, but that provision was eliminated when lawmakers crafted the final version of the K-12 bill (known as the \u201cconference report\u201d).<\/p>\n<p>What Republicans did instead was separate the compensatory revenue from the basic per-pupil formula allowance.\u00a0That means future Legislatures will have to specifically increase the compensatory revenue formula, rather than just boosting the basic formula.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In other words, they took it off the &#8220;autopilot&#8221; that drives so much of our biennial budget discussion. \u00a0The autopilot that drives up proposed spending, leading to &#8220;$5 billion deficits&#8221; and 20-odd percent spending hikes in every budget, and that legislatures will have to <em>do their jobs<\/em>.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Is that a freeze?<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHow on God\u2019s green earth do you argue that it\u2019s a freeze?\u201d said Rep. Pat Garofalo, R-Farmington, the Republican sponsor of the bill. He noted that not only have Dayton and the GOP both left the formula at current law levels, but spending will also increase automatically if there are more poor students.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The Administration let out a rare honest emission:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>At first, Department of Education spokeswoman Charlene Briner agreed the letter got it wrong.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt is incorrect to say that compensatory was frozen in the conference report,\u201d Briner said in an interview. Soon after, Briner sent Hot Dish e-mails backtracking that statement and adding\u00a0 \u201cI think I was incorrect to say that.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe net effect is a freeze,\u201d she wrote, \u201cunless future legislatures act.\u201d In other words, delinking it from the basic formula could mean future legislatures choose not to increase the compensatory revenue formula.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>What? \u00a0Requiring that <em>spending be justified<\/em>? \u00a0The nerve of those peasants!<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Dayton spokeswoman Katie Tinucci said they stand by the veto letter. \u201cIt is our interpretation that the effect of delinking compensatory revenue is the same as freezing it\u2014we cannot rely on the actions of future legislatures.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In other words &#8211; &#8220;spending <em>is <\/em>the goal; shut up and pay up&#8221;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The governor s it a freeze vetoed the K12 Education budget bill&#8230; In his letter vetoing the Republican K-12 budget, Dayton criticized the bill\u2019s \u201cfreezing of compensatory revenue.\u201d The state doles out that money, sometimes more than $400 million a year, based on the number of poor students in each school district. If you suspect [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[127],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20474","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-incredible-shrinking-governor"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20474","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=20474"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20474\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20475,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20474\/revisions\/20475"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=20474"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=20474"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=20474"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}