{"id":19952,"date":"2011-05-13T04:43:25","date_gmt":"2011-05-13T10:43:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=19952"},"modified":"2014-12-12T14:51:34","modified_gmt":"2014-12-12T20:51:34","slug":"government-by-non-sequitur","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=19952","title":{"rendered":"Government By Non-Sequitur"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m not sure what bugs me more about\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.minnpost.com\/stories\/2011\/05\/11\/28200\/surprise_amendment_stuns_senate_during_debate_over_health_care_for_poor\">this Doug Grow column<\/a>; the fact that he deemed a bit of screeching DFL illogic newsworthy, or that he doesn&#8217;t seem to realize that it&#8217;s screechingly illogical at all.<\/p>\n<p>He&#8217;s writing about the MN Senate debate over a Human Services bill which would change the way the state delivers health care to the poor, from a bureaucratic entitlement to a voucher system.<\/p>\n<p>Grow:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Apparently, what&#8217;s good for the goose isn&#8217;t always good for the gander.<\/p>\n<p>That little truth came to light during Tuesday&#8217;s Senate debate over health care for the poor.<\/p>\n<p>Sen. David Hann, R-Eden Prairie, introduced one of the GOP&#8217;s plans for cutting Human Services costs by taking about 15,000 single adults out of MinnesotaCare and giving them vouchers so they can buy their own health insurance.<\/p>\n<p>Hann sang the praises of the bill: It will save the state money. It will give the poor more choices. It will improve the health care of the poor. It will get government out of health care. It&#8217;s the American way!<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>No sarcasm clogging Grow&#8217;s keyboard there. \u00a0Nosirree Bob! \u00a0It&#8217;s the Twin Cities Media way! \u00a0All them poor folks is too dumb to take care of themselves!<\/p>\n<p>But that&#8217;s not really the issue here:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Then, Sen. Barb Goodwin, DFL-Columbia Heights, rose to speak. She offered a simple amendment to this GOP plan.<\/p>\n<p>She said her amendment would require legislators to test the plan for two years, before the poor were forced into it.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I hear what a wonderful deal this is for people,&#8221; Goodwin said. &#8220;We can determine if this plan is working as it should.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Amendment greeted with silence<\/p>\n<p>For a moment, you could have heard a pin drop in the Senate chambers. What? Us on this plan?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>When columnists try to play mind-readers, it&#8217;s pretty my much their own minds they end up reading. \u00a0Because I know that if I&#8217;d been sitting in that Senate chamber, I&#8217;d have been quiet, myself. \u00a0But not from taking offense at someone thinking I&#8217;d <em>dream <\/em>of being lumped in with the <em>hoi-polloi<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>No, it&#8217;d be because I&#8217;d be wondering&#8230;:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>&#8230;if Senator Goodwin gets the difference between <em>people doing a job who get health insurance as part of their compensation<\/em> &#8211; the legislators, in this case &#8211; and <em>people who come to the taxpayers for help with getting health care<\/em>? \u00a0If she recognizes a difference between someone who takes a job (yes, even an elected one) with full knowledge of what the health benefits are, just like most of us in the private sector do (with benefits that are admittedly not nearly as nice), and&#8230;<\/li>\n<li>&#8230;if she realizes how much of the private sector is moving in the direction of <em>self-directed health care<\/em> &#8211; where the consumer makes the key decisions about their own health care&#8230;<\/li>\n<li>&#8230;whether she\u00a0appreciates\u00a0the idea that vouchers, compared to the trough-slopping reality of most government entitlement programs, <em>gives the recipient some dignity<\/em>&#8230;<\/li>\n<li>&#8230;or, for that matter, giving public healthcare for the poor any chance of being sustainable <em>at all<\/em>&#8230;<\/li>\n<li>&#8230; or if any of that matters compared to her prevailing priority &#8211; keep the bureaucracy fat &#8216;n happy?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Doubt it&#8217;d be fit all that into a politic statement if I didn&#8217;t have the floor.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>A rookie senator, Gretchen Hoffman, R-Vergas, stood, clearly offended by Goodwin&#8217;s amendment.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re citizen legislators,&#8221; she said, adding that she&#8217;d waived her right to receive the health insurance benefits that most legislators receive.<\/p>\n<p>After proclaiming her own goodness, she attacked the Goodwin amendment.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>One wonders if Grow would ever call a DFLer a &#8220;Rookie&#8221;, or write off their defense as &#8220;proclaiming their goodness&#8221;.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;Political tomfoolery,&#8221; Hoffman said.<\/p>\n<p>Again there was silence in the Senate. It had been years since anyone had heard the expression &#8220;tomfoolery.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>And later, Goodwin said that &#8220;tomfoolery&#8221; had never been applied to her before.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>If &#8220;tomfoolery&#8221; means &#8216;incapable of carrying on a logical argument&#8221;, I&#8217;ll be it has.<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, here&#8217;s what they&#8217;re arguing about;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Back up for a moment and look at the plan Hann sings the praises of but \u2014 as it turned out \u2014 wouldn&#8217;t want for himself.<\/p>\n<p>Single working adults who have incomes of between 133 percent and 250 percent of poverty-level would no longer be covered by MinnesotaCare, the publicly subsidized health insurance program for the working poor that&#8217;s been in existence since 1990. Under MinnesotaCare, low-income working people pay premiums on a sliding scale based on ability to pay.<\/p>\n<p>The Republican plan would force those earning between $14,400 and $30,000 off MinnesotaCare and into the &#8220;free&#8221; market. With the help of state vouchers, they could select the health insurance they want for themselves.<\/p>\n<p>Hann says that by &#8220;allowing&#8221; these people to go into the free market, the state would save $100 million per biennium.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>And since they&#8217;re &#8220;single, working&#8221; adults &#8211; unlike Grow, I&#8217;m using using scare quotes in place of an actual argument &#8211; it seems like a great compromise. \u00a0Grow&#8217;s, and Goodwin&#8217;s, only argument seems to be that Senators don&#8217;t want to trade their current plans for it.<\/p>\n<p>By that &#8220;logic&#8221;, Goodwin and Grow should both shut up and go on welfare, including MNCare.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m not sure what bugs me more about\u00a0this Doug Grow column; the fact that he deemed a bit of screeching DFL illogic newsworthy, or that he doesn&#8217;t seem to realize that it&#8217;s screechingly illogical at all. He&#8217;s writing about the MN Senate debate over a Human Services bill which would change the way the state [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[326,66,2,132,69],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19952","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-big-alt-media","category-health-care","category-minnesota-politics","category-mn-legislature","category-socialism"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19952","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=19952"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19952\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19977,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19952\/revisions\/19977"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=19952"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=19952"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=19952"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}