{"id":1898,"date":"2008-01-03T13:04:44","date_gmt":"2008-01-03T18:04:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=1898"},"modified":"2008-01-03T12:15:39","modified_gmt":"2008-01-03T17:15:39","slug":"words-matter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=1898","title":{"rendered":"Words Matter"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Over at True North, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.looktruenorth.com\/culture\/new-media-blogs\/58-new-media-blogs\/1396-welcome-to-the-qmodern-american-newsroomq.html\">Swiftee<\/a> assails the Minnesota Monitor&#8217;s (and its parent body, the Center for Independent Media&#8217;s) claims of &#8220;independence&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>As does <a href=\"http:\/\/beltwayblogroll.nationaljournal.com\/archives\/2007\/12\/independence_vs.php\">this piece by Danny Glover<\/a> at the Beltway Blogroll:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I don&#8217;t have a problem with [partisanship and political principle in journalism], and I&#8217;m perfectly fine with both existing within the new media order &#8212; so long as people are transparent and honest with readers about their partisan leanings and their principles.<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t believe that&#8217;s entirely the case here.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I think that&#8217;s been the issue most of us on the right have had with the Monitor and the CIM since its inception; not that it&#8217;s a rent-a-blog, but that it&#8217;s been opaque to the point of disingenuity about both its funding and its mission.<\/p>\n<p>Glover:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The folks behind the center clearly understand &#8220;independent&#8221; to mean something different than most politically informed Americans, and Morley was transparent about defining the term as he understands it. But casting as independent a Washington-oriented publication that admittedly is not politically independent, of both party and philosophy, is still misleading&#8230;calling the new publication The Washington Progressive and its parent the Center For Progressive Media would be far more truthful. Why run from the political terminology the operation embraces?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That&#8217;s bothered me; it seems as if the Center and the Monitor have tried to have their cake and eat it too &#8211; publishing explicitly &#8220;progressive&#8221; content, while trying to camouflage the motivation.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The Center for Independent Media has a worthwhile mission, and people with competing worldviews should consider organizing similar efforts to train the next generation of journalists. Anyone who reports the news with what Morley calls a &#8220;moral perspective,&#8221; regardless of what that perspective is, needs to pursue &#8220;rigorous adherence to the highest standards of journalism.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, the center&#8217;s word choice, something endemic to sound journalism, does not rise to those standards.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Read all three pieces.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Over at True North, Swiftee assails the Minnesota Monitor&#8217;s (and its parent body, the Center for Independent Media&#8217;s) claims of &#8220;independence&#8221;. As does this piece by Danny Glover at the Beltway Blogroll: I don&#8217;t have a problem with [partisanship and political principle in journalism], and I&#8217;m perfectly fine with both existing within the new media [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[31,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1898","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blogs","category-media"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1898","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1898"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1898\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1898"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1898"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1898"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}