{"id":17464,"date":"2011-01-17T12:00:22","date_gmt":"2011-01-17T18:00:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=17464"},"modified":"2011-01-17T11:17:27","modified_gmt":"2011-01-17T17:17:27","slug":"dfl-to-minnesota-taxpayers-403-winston","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=17464","title":{"rendered":"DFL To Minnesota Taxpayers: &#8220;4+0=3, Winston&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As I pointed out this morning, the notion of the &#8220;Budget Deficit&#8221; is at best a bit of manipulative spin; at worst, it&#8217;s an outright fraud on Minnesota voters and taxpayers.\u00a0 Especially taxpayers.<\/p>\n<p>We walked back a couple of the more toxic myths about the Minnesota budget this morning, including the thing all Real Minnesota Taxpayers have to keep trying to hammer home with your friends, relatives and neighbors; <em>the &#8220;deficit&#8221; is a fraud<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>And yet that&#8217;s only scratching the surface of the myths in this deeply abusive media meme.<\/p>\n<p><strong>&#8220;Were Balancing The Budget On The Backs Of The Poor&#8221;<\/strong>: On the one hand, <a href=\"I've been fiddling about with trying to find more oblique, writer-y ways to say it - but sometimes the direct approach is best. Talk of a $6.2 Billion deficit is a fraud. People who refer to is are mistaken at best, lying at worst. What we have is not a $6.2 billion deficit. It's a little more like this: Imagine you take your kids to McDonald's once a week. Your son, a budding DFLer, demands that you add a weekly trip to Murray's for the family once a week. You refuse. Your idiot child goes to the media and tells them that you are &quot;cutting the budget by $300 a week&quot;. What do you do? Give the kids the trip to Murray's and quit complaining? You must be a DFLer. The Budget Deficit Is Based On A Wish List: The &quot;deficit&quot; that the DFL and media - and even a few Republicans - are talking about is exactly the same thing. It's assessed against the &quot;2012-2013 Budget Forecast&quot;. Which, you may note, is a forecast. Not a &quot;budget&quot;; a forecast. The &quot;budget&quot; is something the legislature hashes out on odd-numbered years for the following even-and-odd-numbered pair of years (called a &quot;biennium&quot;); in 2009, the Legislature passted the budget for 2010 and 2011. That, and only that, is the &quot;budget&quot;. The &quot;forecast&quot;, on the other hand, is what the budget will be in the following biennium, assuming that the budget increases according to current assumptions, legal mandates, and legislative wishes. So the forecast comes partly from &quot;baseline budgeting&quot; - starting with the current budget for a deparment and guesstimating how much more of that department's &quot;services&quot; will be &quot;needed&quot;. In some cases, there are legal mandates involved, And in most of them, there's the DFL's urge to leave a huge budgetary turd the GOP' doorstep. Because whatever the cause, the DFL legislature that just got sent packing &quot;forecast&quot; the budget jumping from $30.266 billion to $38.591 billion - a 27.51% jump. Did you increase your family budget 27.51%? No. And either did the government - yet. Because the budget process - the one that leads us to the actual budget - just started, really, last week. The &quot;Structural Deficit&quot; Is A Cop-Out: It is true that there are legal mandates to increase parts of the budget. The answer is deceptively simple; if you have a structural problem, the best - albeit not necessarily easiest - way to fix it is to fix the structure. Put another way, these mandates need to be reassessed, and most likely abolished. House File 2, sponsored by Rep. Banaian, will be a good start; it'll start to chip away at the current practice of increasing spending for programs on autopilot; every government department will have to justify its spending and, in its most gratifyingly Scandinavian feature, sic the Legislative Auditor on state agencies with an aim toward sunsetting them when their usefulness has passed. The most important thing to remember, though - and tell your co-workers and family members and neighbors, if the topic comes up - is, once again, this: The &quot;Budget Deficit&quot; is a fraud. \">Minnesota pays among the most-generous welfare benefits in the country<\/a> &#8211; &#8220;good&#8221; enough to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.demography.state.mn.us\/documents\/migrate.pdf\">draw people <em>to <\/em>Minnesota to cash in<\/a>.  It&#8217;s seem we have some room to pare things back without really hurting anyone. But the statement itself is yet another fraud.<\/p>\n<p>And on the other hand, if hard times call for shared sacrifice, then why are &#8220;the poor&#8221; exempt from&#8230;keeping their funding the same, or at the very most to an inflation-adjusted increase, as well as a trimming of the most gratuitous fat?<\/p>\n<p>And by that, I mean as opposed to having &#8220;Health And Human Services funding\u00a0 jacked up by, ahem, <em>37%<\/em> &#8211; which is what the DFL-dominated Legislature &#8220;forecast&#8221; for the 2012-2013 biennium two years ago (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.mmb.state.mn.us\/doc\/fu\/10\/complete-nov10.pdf\">see page 4 of this PDF file<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>Is the DFL planning for 37% more poor\u00a0 people?\u00a0 Or are we going to subsidize the poverty we have 37% more?<\/p>\n<p><strong>&#8220;Holding The K-12 Budget SteadyWill Gut Education&#8221;<\/strong>:\u00a0 Except that the DFL&#8217;s budget &#8220;forecast&#8221; planned to increase K-12 funding by 7.6% &#8211; with <em>almost all of it going to increasing Teachers&#8217; Union salaries and headcount<\/em>.\u00a0 It&#8217;s yet another case of the DFL trying not only to insulate its biggest constituency &#8211; government and its employees &#8211; from\u00a0<em> <\/em>the economy the rest of us have to live with.<em><\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>Budget cuts will &#8220;force&#8221; property tax hikes<\/strong>: Yet another bit of fraud.  Cuts to &#8220;Local Government Aid&#8221; will make local governments responsible for (more of) their own spending, which is currently taken care of by state taxpayers.\u00a0 Local Government Aid was intended to help smaller, poorer cities afford some of the amenities they couldn&#8217;t afford &#8211; luxuries like water treatment, sewers, actual roads and the like.\u00a0 It has become a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=11081\">subsidy of DFL-controlled city governments<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, the budget is chock-full of little deficit-building subsidies for one DFL favored class or another.\u00a0 The legislature is going to be addressing quite a number of them &#8211; in the interest of controlling the deficit &#8211; soon.<\/p>\n<p>Stay tuned.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As I pointed out this morning, the notion of the &#8220;Budget Deficit&#8221; is at best a bit of manipulative spin; at worst, it&#8217;s an outright fraud on Minnesota voters and taxpayers.\u00a0 Especially taxpayers. We walked back a couple of the more toxic myths about the Minnesota budget this morning, including the thing all Real Minnesota [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[117,2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17464","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-dayton-dustbowl","category-minnesota-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17464","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=17464"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17464\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17466,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17464\/revisions\/17466"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=17464"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=17464"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=17464"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}