{"id":14279,"date":"2010-10-12T12:56:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-12T17:56:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=14279"},"modified":"2014-10-05T14:38:03","modified_gmt":"2014-10-05T19:38:03","slug":"im-not-a-reporter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=14279","title":{"rendered":"I&#8217;m Not A Reporter"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>But if I were, I&#8217;d have a bunch of questions of Mark Dayton, his campaign, and the maze of PACs and organizations that are bankrolling his campaign.<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s start at the top:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Settle Me This: <\/strong>So how much <em>did <\/em>you pay in your settlement to Brad Hanson? Since you were employed by the Senate, is it correct to assume that it was originally paid by the taxpayer &#8211; is that a fair assumption? \u00a0When did you agree to pay the settlement off yourself &#8211; specifically, before or after you won the primary? \u00a0Why <em>did <\/em>you litigate this case for a solid\u00a0half-decade, all the way to the US Supreme Court?<\/li>\n<li><strong>Why So Angry?<\/strong>: While Tom Emmer has been almost over-the-top in his civility and positivity &#8211; refusing to even call you &#8220;The Opposition&#8221; in a radio interview last September, on the ideal that we all need to be on the same side eventually &#8211; your campaign is distinguished by having been <em>almost entirely negative<\/em>. \u00a0Your campaign has been heavy on witch-hunting (&#8220;tax the rich!&#8221;, references to Bush and Michele Bachmann and Tim Pawlenty), scapegoating (&#8220;the rich&#8221;) and the occasional assurance that you are, indeed, part of some sort of Minnesota tradition. \u00a0 And your campaign&#8217;s main mouthpiece, Alliance for a Better Minnesota, has run an absolute slime-fest &#8211; lying and\/or mangling the context of Emmer&#8217;s criminal record, proposed education budget, and voting record. \u00a0Do you <em>have <\/em>a positive vision for your proposed administration? \u00a0Please state it. \u00a0Take your time, we can wait.<\/li>\n<li><strong>What&#8217;s A Billion Or So Among Friends?<\/strong>: Your first attempt at a budget came up <em>three billion dollars <\/em>shy of solving the deficit. \u00a0Your second attempt is at least $890 million short, and given that even MPR figured out that you can&#8217;t cut $425 million in contractors without changing a lot of laws and regulations, it&#8217;s pretty likely to be well over a billion again. \u00a0Since you&#8217;re already soaking the rich, and you really are committed to not cutting a whole lot (since government is mostly sacred cows that are an integral part of your political base), what alternative <em>do <\/em>you have to soaking the middle class?<\/li>\n<li><strong>Let Them Eat Food Stamps!<\/strong>: Your program looks, at best, to be a minor boon to state workers, and at the very, very best a hit to private employment. \u00a0Where and how does your plan facilitate private-sector job creation in Minnesota? \u00a0In fact, can you respond to the idea that further hikes on taxes will hamper private job creation?<\/li>\n<li><strong>Between The Ears<\/strong>: The hit campaign run by your various PAC supporters has tried to paint Tom Emmer as temperamental. \u00a0OK &#8211; let&#8217;s talk temperament. Six years ago today you closed your Senate office. \u00a0You were branded &#8220;the Bumbler&#8221; by <em>Time <\/em>Magazine, which normally effuses <em>for <\/em>liberals. \u00a0In the aftermath of the 9\/11 commission hearings, you launched a thousand conspiracy theories against the Bush administration, the Pentagon and the FAA for political purposes. \u00a0You&#8217;ve been treated for depression, and are a recovering alcoholic that&#8217;s had two relapses in the past decade. \u00a0Given your surrogates&#8217; assaults on Tom Emmer, how can you say <em>you <\/em>are temperamentally suited to serve as governor? \u00a0And by the way, what is the nature of your current treatment for depression? \u00a0And while you don&#8217;t have to answer, I need to ask; what is your current DSM-IV classification?<\/li>\n<li><strong><span style=\"font-weight: normal;\"><strong>Paperwork!<\/strong>: You have opposed alternative teacher licensure &#8211; and yet your career as a teacher in New York\u00a0, which you&#8217;ve chosen to make a key part of your public-service image,\u00a0was made possible by alternative licensing. \u00a0Please resolve this bit of cognitive dissonance. <\/span><\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong>Paperwork, Paperwork, Paperwork<\/strong>: Speaking of your teaching career, what coursework did you complete at U of Massachusetts Amherst? \u00a0Could you release a transcript?<\/li>\n<li><strong>Attendance<\/strong>: Since your surrogates at ABM chose to highlight Tom Emmer&#8217;s &#8220;absences&#8221; from the House of Representatives, please tell us why your &#8220;teaching career&#8221; in New York only involved 84 days in the classroom during a period when there were at least 240 days when school was in session?<\/li>\n<li><strong>More Paperwork!<\/strong>: What were the &#8220;personal reasons&#8221; for which you left the New York schools? \u00a0 If someone were to say &#8220;because your likelihood of being drafted had dropped&#8221;, would you consider that accurate or inaccurate, and why?<\/li>\n<li><strong>Staff<\/strong>: Can you announce any prospective staff appointments? \u00a0Specifically, is there any truth to the rumor that Mike Hatch is going to be your Chief of Staff?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Now, that&#8217;s what I&#8217;d ask if I were a reporter.<\/p>\n<p>But I&#8217;m not. \u00a0I&#8217;m just a guy in Saint Paul with a job and a mortgage and a couple of kids. \u00a0We have a class of High Priests of Information in this town, people sworn to the arcane code of the &#8220;Professional Journalist&#8221; whose job it is to ask these sorts of questions.<\/p>\n<p>So will they?<\/p>\n<p>Will Bill Salisbury use his position as &#8220;dean of Minnesota capitol correspondents&#8221; and his access to the campaign to ask any of these questions?<\/p>\n<p>Will Tim Pugmire and Tom Scheck live up to MPR&#8217;s current &#8220;No Rant, No Slant&#8221; tagline, and get answers from Mark Dayton on these sorts of questions? (Let&#8217;s return to discuss Keri Miller, whose contempt for Tom Emmer oozes from every audible pore, some other time).<\/p>\n<p>Will Rachel Stassen-Berger, scienne of a Minnesota family nearly as household-y as Dayton himself, decide that the public as a right to know any of these things &#8211; before the election, anyway, while people are paying attention?<\/p>\n<p>Will David Brauer and Erik Black use the stated independence of their platform, the MinnPost, from the DFL and its media-political complex to enquire further?<\/p>\n<p>Will the <em>Minnesota &#8220;Independent&#8221; <\/em>, the &#8220;Uptake&#8221; and &#8220;Common Cause&#8221;<em>&#8230;<\/em> er, ever have to register as 501(c)4 lobbying groups?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>But if I were, I&#8217;d have a bunch of questions of Mark Dayton, his campaign, and the maze of PACs and organizations that are bankrolling his campaign. Let&#8217;s start at the top: Settle Me This: So how much did you pay in your settlement to Brad Hanson? Since you were employed by the Senate, is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[60,4],"tags":[115,143,312],"class_list":["post-14279","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-campaign-10","category-media","tag-abm","tag-common-cause","tag-mngov-2010"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14279","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=14279"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14279\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":47785,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14279\/revisions\/47785"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=14279"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=14279"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=14279"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}