{"id":13475,"date":"2010-09-14T12:57:46","date_gmt":"2010-09-14T17:57:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=13475"},"modified":"2014-12-12T14:52:54","modified_gmt":"2014-12-12T20:52:54","slug":"the-dayton-dust-bowl-details-details","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=13475","title":{"rendered":"The Dayton Dust Bowl: Details, Details"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Twin Cities media continues its ongoing wet tongue kiss of Mark Dayton. \u00a0This time, it’s Eric Black at the MinnPost – who sniffs <\/a>that if you’re of those weirdos that focuses on big principles and visions of limited government getting out of the peoples’ way, then maybe Tom Emmer might be for you. \u00a0But…<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

But \u00a0if you value straight talk about what a candidate plans to do, based on facts and logic, DFL guv nominee Mark Dayton demonstrated again today at the Humphrey Institute that he is in a class by himself.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

That’s another way of saying, apparently, that he droned on about facts and figures for a long, long time.<\/p>\n

He also told the press gaggle in the hallway that he may not release the figures he gets from the Revenue Department on his plan, suggesting that it was getting to be unfair that he is so transparent about his taxing and spending proposals while Emmer continues to be so mysterious.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

That’s our Twin Cities media; always looking out to make sure people are “fair” to Mark Dayton. \u00a0Whether it’s making sure nobody “unfairly” notes his and his family’s contributions<\/a> to the PAC that’s been running a three-month smear campaign that gets an “F” for accuracy<\/a> from “factcheck.org”, to breathlessly parroting Daytons’ whinging about the “unfairness” of the GOP trackers<\/a> actually holding him accountable for his statements (like saying at yesterday’s debate that cutting state contractors will save over $600 million a year, when his own budget “plan” says it’s more like $425, and even <\/a>that <\/a><\/em>is misleading<\/a>).<\/p>\n

He told [U of M Poli Sci professor Larry] Jacobs that he won\u2019t raise the whole $4 billion he seeks from the taxes he has specified so far, and during his presentation he told the audience that he is \u201clooking for suggestions\u201d of other revenue-raising ideas that will be consistent with his overall determination to make the state tax system more progressive<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In other words, for all the “detail” Dayton offers, he can’t close the budget. \u00a0Even his own budget “plan” says he comes up over $600,000,000 short – and that’s assuming that the legislature under a Dayton Administration, likely to be much <\/em>more conservative than the 2010 class, would pass a tax hike fifteen times as large <\/em>as the one that passed \u00a0by exactly one vote (that of Taryll Clark) in the last session.<\/p>\n

So could you please pony up an idea or two, so Eric Black’s narrative can remain undisturbed?<\/p>\n

Within an hour or so, Tom Emmer is going to release a plan. \u00a0It is going to make the DFLers yak up their skulls, because it will not hold government immune from the vagaries of the economy (which is all <\/em>Dayton and Horner plan to do).<\/p>\n

But I’m fairly confident it’ll provide the answers Dayton’s “plan” fobs off for later.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Twin Cities media continues its ongoing wet tongue kiss of Mark Dayton. \u00a0This time, it’s Eric Black at the MinnPost – who sniffs that if you’re of those weirdos that focuses on big principles and visions of limited government getting out of the peoples’ way, then maybe Tom Emmer might be for you. \u00a0But… […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[326,117],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13475","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-big-alt-media","category-dayton-dustbowl"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13475","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=13475"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13475\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13484,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13475\/revisions\/13484"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=13475"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=13475"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=13475"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}