{"id":1196,"date":"2007-08-14T11:26:54","date_gmt":"2007-08-14T16:26:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=1196"},"modified":"2012-04-12T06:28:08","modified_gmt":"2012-04-12T11:28:08","slug":"shots-fired-update","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=1196","title":{"rendered":"Shots Fired:  Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s been over two months since that afternoon in June when &#8211; depending on who you believe &#8211; either:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>an irresponsible citizen who should never have been given a carry permit (under a law that should never have passed!) freaked out and shot a mild-mannered undercover cop who may have been acting a bit aggressively, or<\/li>\n<li>a citizen, thrust into a situation no man should have to face when a stranger who&#8217;d been behaving in a threatening manner pulled up beside him when he was boxed in at a light, and pointed a gun at his wife, pulled his legally-permitted handgun and shot the aggressor &#8211; who turned out to be an undercover cop who was stretching the prerogatives of his badge <em>all <\/em>out of shape.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>You recall the situation (and if you don&#8217;t, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?s=treptow\">here&#8217;s a partial list of my coverage<\/a>); the citizen, Martin Treptow, an out-of-work security guard with a legal carry permit, was taken into custody (absolutely normal in these situations, even if there&#8217;s not a cop involved) &#8211; and then promptly released without charge, and without his carry permit even being suspended (absolutely <em>abnormal <\/em>in these situations).<\/p>\n<p>And since then&#8230;silence.\u00a0 Nothing.\u00a0 Zilch.\u00a0 Indeed, as Joel Rosenberg and Andrew Rothman <a href=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=1026\">noted<\/a> in Joel&#8217;s blog and in a couple of appearances on the NARN, <em>less than nothing<\/em>; the official silence has the appearance of a coverup, amid allegations (from sources with knowlege of the case and of the officer involved) that the cop behaved <em>very <\/em>improperly.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/joelrosenberg.livejournal.com\/209690.html?mode=reply\">Joel has the latest<\/a> &#8211; and while it doesn&#8217;t read like a lot is happening, read closely:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[Anoka County Attorney] <a href=\"http:\/\/joelrosenberg.livejournal.com\/204788.html\">Robert M. A. Johnson<\/a>&#8230;has empaneled a grand jury in the <a href=\"http:\/\/joelrosenberg.livejournal.com\/204334.html\">Treptow case<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>What will be a secret &#8212; and is unlikely to leak directly &#8212; is what exactly will happen inside the grand jury room; by law, such proceedings are secret, and leak only sometimes.<\/p>\n<p>That said, there are some things that are clear at this point:<\/p>\n<p>1. There&#8217;s no legal need for a grand jury. If Johnson wanted to indict somebody in this, he could do it without a grand jury.<\/p>\n<p>2. There may be a political use for a grand jury. Prosecutors can use grand juries to investigate complex cases &#8212; and this one isn&#8217;t that. The investigation was complete within days of the incident; all the witnesses that the Coon Rapids\/Anoka authorities wanted to interview, and who were cooperative, had talked to the cops within hours, or a very few days, of the attack.<\/p>\n<p>But a prosecutor can use a grand jury to indict a politically-difficult-to-indict defendant, or as an excuse for not indicting anybody. There&#8217;s an old saying: a prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>As Joel points out, Johnson is not politically vulnerable.\u00a0 So the question is, which potential indictment is the political hot-potato?\u00a0 Treptow, or &#8220;Officer Friendly&#8221;?<\/p>\n<p>I am not a lawyer, but I strongly suspect that if Treptow were remotely vulnerable to being charged under the circumstances, he&#8217;d have been charged long ago.\u00a0 Self-defense shooting is a tricky legal tightrope, with more legal pitfalls than dating LaToya Jackson; if someone&#8217;s going to screw up, it&#8217;s probably (I suspect) going to be obvious enough that a &#8220;hereditary&#8221; (see Joel&#8217;s explanation) county attorney isn&#8217;t going to worry about losing political capital.<\/p>\n<p>But indicting a cop?\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Hm.<\/p>\n<p>Joel continues (and I add emphasis):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>A prosecutor can also carefully not present enough evidence to persuade a grand jury to indict anybody, and <strong>use that as an excuse &#8212; say, if the defendant is a public employee whose indictment would be politically embarrassing.<\/strong> &#8220;Hey; it wasn&#8217;t my fault. The grand jury refused to do anything.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Finally: \u00a0<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s not quite a guarantee, but it&#8217;s a very safe bet that Martin Treptow won&#8217;t be indicted. I wouldn&#8217;t be utterly surprised, though, if Rebecca Treptow was called in front of the grand jury &#8212; that would be, as far as I know, the first time that anybody involved in law enforcement would have so much as made any effort whatsoever to interview her since June 7.<\/p>\n<p>(Yup, you read that right: the highly professional law enforcement professionals of the Coon Rapids PD, the Anoka County Sheriff&#8217;s Office, and the Anoka County Attorney&#8217;s office made, as far as I know, no attempt whatsoever to interview the key witness in more than two months of their &#8220;investigation.&#8221;\u00a0 They certainly made no attempt to talk to her within the first month.\u00a0 Gee, I wonder why . . . .)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Read the whole thing.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>CORRECTION:\u00a0 Afternoon, not evening.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s been over two months since that afternoon in June when &#8211; depending on who you believe &#8211; either: an irresponsible citizen who should never have been given a carry permit (under a law that should never have passed!) freaked out and shot a mild-mannered undercover cop who may have been acting a bit aggressively, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[216],"class_list":["post-1196","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-victim-disarmament","tag-treptow"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1196","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1196"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1196\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27403,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1196\/revisions\/27403"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1196"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1196"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1196"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}