{"id":1158,"date":"2007-08-07T04:11:03","date_gmt":"2007-08-07T09:11:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=1158"},"modified":"2007-08-06T17:21:39","modified_gmt":"2007-08-06T22:21:39","slug":"obie-not-ready-for-prime-time-or-neocon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=1158","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;Neocon&#8221; or &#8220;Not Ready for Prime Time&#8221;?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I pilloried &#8211; justifiably &#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=1127\">Obie&#8217;s saber-rattling<\/a> over Pakistan &#8211; but <a href=\"http:\/\/www.opinionjournal.com\/editorial\/feature.html?id=110010428\">Taranto notes<\/a> that at least there&#8217;s <em>some <\/em>good news in Obama&#8217;s flub:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>As a candidate recently pilloried by fellow Democrats as a foreign policy na\u00eff, Mr. Obama&#8217;s remarks may be no more than an effort to don a Mike Dukakis helmet. And given the Senator&#8217;s consistent opposition to the war in Iraq, it may seem peculiar that he should now propose invading a nuclear-armed Muslim country&#8211;all the more so since Mr. Obama let slip Thursday in an interview that as President he would rule out the use of nuclear weapons &#8220;in any circumstance.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But in a primary contest where Democrats seem to vie with one another for the title of who will pull out of Iraq the fastest, Mr. Obama&#8217;s speech is at least a recognition that he&#8217;d be willing to use military force <em>somewhere. <\/em>It&#8217;s also a reminder to antiwar Democratic voters that the terror threat won&#8217;t vanish when the Bush Administration does, and that U.S. soldiers will have to be put in harm&#8217;s way again.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Mr. Obama:\u00a0 Pakistani WMDs <em>most definitely do <\/em>exist.\u00a0 And what a wonderful way to radicalize not only Musharraf&#8217;s society, but to re-radicalize Pakistan&#8217;s intelligence service, which was until recently overrun with Wahhabi sympathizers and actively aided (and, no doubt, in many quarters still aids) Al-Quaeda.<\/p>\n<p>Still&#8230;:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Too bad, then, that Mr. Obama instantly squandered an opportunity for seriousness by insisting that Iraq is &#8220;the wrong battlefield&#8221; in the war on terror. In case he hasn&#8217;t noticed, Iraq today is the main battlefield where U.S. forces are confronting, and killing, al Qaeda on a daily basis. And GIs don&#8217;t have to invade another country to do it.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The best news about Obie&#8217;s jape, of course, is it shows that being &#8220;anti-war&#8221; is losing at least some of its cachet on the left &#8211; at least, in responsible quarters on the left:\u00a0<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Still, Mr. Obama&#8217;s willingness to draw appropriate conclusions from realities in Pakistan stands in refreshing contrast to his Democratic opponents. Tragic as a premature withdrawal from Iraq would be, it would be compounded if Democrats draw the lesson never again to use or threaten force abroad. By distancing himself from his party&#8217;s pacifist wing, Mr. Obama is growing up as a candidate.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Worth a read.<\/p>\n<p>And then read <a href=\"http:\/\/corner.nationalreview.com\/post\/?q=YjcwZmVkNzEyN2FiMGFkZjBjY2ZhMWY4YzAxN2EyNzk=\">Victor Davis Hanson&#8217;s detailed takedown<\/a> of our newly hawkish \u00fcberliberal.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I pilloried &#8211; justifiably &#8211; Obie&#8217;s saber-rattling over Pakistan &#8211; but Taranto notes that at least there&#8217;s some good news in Obama&#8217;s flub: As a candidate recently pilloried by fellow Democrats as a foreign policy na\u00eff, Mr. Obama&#8217;s remarks may be no more than an effort to don a Mike Dukakis helmet. And given the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1158","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-war-on-terror"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1158","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1158"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1158\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1158"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1158"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1158"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}