{"id":1003,"date":"2007-07-02T07:26:48","date_gmt":"2007-07-02T13:26:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php\/index.php\/2007\/07\/02\/anonymous-sources-epilogue\/"},"modified":"2014-12-12T14:53:24","modified_gmt":"2014-12-12T20:53:24","slug":"anonymous-sources-epilogue","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/?p=1003","title":{"rendered":"Anonymous Sources &#8211; Epilogue"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Someone asked me, in relation to my\u00a0series\u00a0 (Parts <a href=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php\/index.php\/2007\/06\/27\/anonymous-sources-part-i-bad-manners\/\">I<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php\/index.php\/2007\/06\/29\/anonymous-sources-part-ii-say-what\/\">II<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php\/index.php\/2007\/07\/02\/anonymous-sources-part-iii-in-someone-elses-words\/\">III<\/a>)\u00a0\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0<em>Minnesota Monitor&#8217;s <\/em>sloppy attribution and possible apparent plagiarism\u00a0&#8211; &#8220;why are you pounding so hard on Jeff Fecke?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ll cite Michael Corleone; &#8220;It&#8217;s not personal.\u00a0 It&#8217;s business&#8221;.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Oh, I&#8217;ll cop to having &#8220;creative differences&#8221; with Fecke; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.moderateleft.com\">his non-<em>Monitor <\/em>blogging<\/a> over the past few years has slid into a morass of Atrios-style snarking.\u00a0 It irritates me, as a conservative, as a blogger, and as a reader.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>But that hardly makes Fecke unique among leftybloggers; he&#8217;s been doing it a long time, and among what passes for the mainstream of leftybloggers, he&#8217;s no worse than most, better than quite a few.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>It <em>is <\/em>business.<\/p>\n<p>Part of it is that, as someone who once <em>did <\/em>aspire to be a journalist, it sticks in my craw when I see people practicing the craft shoddily &#8211; even allowing that I was no master of the craft myself.\u00a0 As a conservative, it irritates me even more when that slipshod craft is practiced toward partisan ends.<\/p>\n<p>But above all?<\/p>\n<p>We &#8211; overtly partisan bloggers of the left and the right &#8211; are engaged in a battle for the hearts and minds of Americans; of Minnesotans.\u00a0 Left-leaning benefactors &#8211; from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnsnews.com\/ViewSpecialReports.asp?Page=%5CSpecialReports%5Carchive%5C200503%5CSPE20050303a.html\">George Soros<\/a> on down &#8211; are pouring a <em>lot <\/em>of money into trying to win that battle, from projects big (bankrolling attack-PR firm &#8220;Media Matters for America&#8221;, with whom the <em>Monitor&#8217;s <\/em>parent organization, the Center for Independent Media, used to share offices) to small (trying to establish online publications like the <em>Monitor<\/em> and its sister publications, <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.coloradoconfidential.com\/\">Colorado Confidential<\/a> <\/em>and the ironically-named <a href=\"http:\/\/www.iowaindependent.com\/magFront.do\"><em>Iowa Independant<\/em><\/a>\u00a0as reputable &#8220;news&#8221; organizations<em>).\u00a0 <\/em>They are &#8211; in my opinion &#8211; trying to buy credibility.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s working, in many respects; the mainstream media routinely carries Media Matters hit pieces as if they were independent research; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tpt.org\/aatc\/blogdigest\/categories\/1?page=3\">some local media<\/a> give the <em>Monitor, <\/em>likewise, complete credence.\u00a0 Hiring Eric Black wasn&#8217;t a bad move toward that end, one must admit.<\/p>\n<p>Against that, the center-right independent alternative media has&#8230;well, not a lot of\u00a0money, at least none that I&#8217;ve seen filtering down to us lil&#8217; ol&#8217; conservative bloggers in Minnesota.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Just facts.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>In my three-part series, I presented a bunch of them; either shoddy attribution or plagiarism, depending on your definition of either.\u00a0 I present them, unvarnished, to help the unaligned news consumer and voter gauge the credence they want to give the various news &#8211; and alternative news &#8211; options available to them.<\/p>\n<p>And in the online world, facts are available like never before.<\/p>\n<p>So I&#8217;d like to present this challenge to center-right bloggers in Minnesota; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.minnesotamonitor.com\">look over the <em>Monitor<\/em><\/a>.\u00a0 Find the quotes that are presented as if they were direct quotes made to <em>Monitor <\/em>reporters &#8211; in other words, quotes that are not attributed to press releases, AP copy, or linked to news organization websites or other blogs.\u00a0 And if you&#8217;re a center-right blogger in Iowa or Colorado, you can follow suit with your local Center for Independent Media affiliate as well.<\/p>\n<p>Google &#8217;em.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>See if you get any hits.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>If\u00a0 you do, see if those hits predate the\u00a0<em>MinMon\/ColCon\/IoIndy <\/em>piece in which the otherwise-unattributed quote appeared.<\/p>\n<p>If so &#8211; publish it in your blog.\u00a0 Let the world know.\u00a0 Shine a light on the type of &#8220;credibility&#8221; that the lefty plutocrats&#8217; pieces of silver have bought them.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>And please keep me posted.<\/p>\n<p>The battle for this nation&#8217;s hearts and minds needs to be fought at a higher level.<\/p>\n<p>So let&#8217;s fight it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Someone asked me, in relation to my\u00a0series\u00a0 (Parts I, II and III)\u00a0\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0Minnesota Monitor&#8217;s sloppy attribution and possible apparent plagiarism\u00a0&#8211; &#8220;why are you pounding so hard on Jeff Fecke?&#8221; I&#8217;ll cite Michael Corleone; &#8220;It&#8217;s not personal.\u00a0 It&#8217;s business&#8221;.\u00a0 Oh, I&#8217;ll cop to having &#8220;creative differences&#8221; with Fecke; his non-Monitor blogging over the past few years has [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[326,31,24,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1003","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-big-alt-media","category-blogs","category-culture-war","category-media"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1003","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1003"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1003\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":49895,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1003\/revisions\/49895"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1003"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1003"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.shotinthedark.info\/wp\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1003"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}