As we watch the progress of Minnesota’s “Consitutional Carry” bill – which would remove the law-abiding citizen’s requirement to ask the government for a permit to exercise their Constitutional right to carry a firearm – it’s worth noting the tide that is building in Free America for this utterly sensible measure.
So far this year, Missouri and New Hampshire have enacted Constitutional Carry. That brings the total to 12 states that don’t interfere with their residents’ Constitutional rights.
And North Dakota looks to be likely to pass it shortly (along with a “First Armed Responder in Schools” bill allowing trained school staff to carry permitted firearms). This shows one of the many good things that happen when a state’s Democrat party is reduced to a shadow organization.
My prediction: It passes the Minnesota Legislature with bipartisan majority, to get vetoed by Governor Flint Smith.
Let ’em. Flint Smith can run against that in 2018.
Neither of the bills would “eliminate” the permit to carry. That’s not the point, of course, so we’ll let that slide for now.
Neither bill will eliminate background checks for purchasing firearms. Having a card saying you’ve got a clean background is more or less irrelevant; if a cop has time to see a card, they’ve got time to run your driver’s license or car’s license plates and make sure you’ve got a clean record themselves. The carry permit does nothing but price the right to self-defense out of reach of working-class people.
And the last paragraph is gibberish. Guns sold online have to go through a licensed firearm dealer, lest they break a slew of federal and state laws on both ends. Every firearm sold at a gun show in Minnesota gets a background check already. And the only thing separating a legal and illegal personal transaction is the participant’s honesty and willingness to tell the government what they’re up to. Criminals don’t, and never will. It’s not that complicated.
For most of us.
Rep. Maye Quade is either:
Taking part in a disinformation campaign.
Given that Maye Quade’s wife is a field worker for the Bloombergs, I suspect the answer is “both”.
In December, “Dangerous” was the number one bestselling book on Amazon. It sold enough copies to make the New York Times bestseller list. And the book hadn’t even been published – those were advance sales of a book due to be released in March.
The book won’t be published at all. Simon & Schuster has canceled the book due to a relentless campaign of protests, violence, and boycotts orchestrated by the Left to prevent the author’s message from being heard.
I know what you’re going to say. The author is a Bad Man who has done Bad Things; therefore, any message he might spread must be a Bad Message which should not be heard, but should be ruthlessly suppressed to protect innocent minds from being corrupted.
Of course, that’s merely the Ad Hominem logical fallacy used to apply Alinksky’s Fourth Rule, which is standard fare for Liberals who believe the ends justify the means, I get all that. Here’s my question: does it matter whether the Bad Message is suppressed Before it’s published or After it’s published? Is censorship worse than intimidation? Is banning better than burning? Because that’s the side you’re on, Liberals. You’re standing with the book burners.
Are you proud of it?
To the left, there is neither pride, nor good, nor bad. There is merely power and control. All else is a sideshow.
St. Paul has mandatory recycling and the chips allow the trucks to see if you’re recycling enough. The City claims they have no plans to enforce the recycling ordinance that way . . . but that’s what the State said about seatbelts, too. Has nobody heard of the camel’s nose?
When they quietly implement the next phase, the justification will be to save the planet ‘for the children.’ But that means the recycling company (hence the government) will be able to track not just how many pounds of recycling you submit, but also which brand of booze you drink, which magazines you read (Playboy ‘for the articles’, NRA kook stuff, survivor militia newsletters, right-wingnut National Review), what foods you eat (so they can assist you in healthier life choices no doubt), and so on.
I suppose next, I’ll have to go sneaking around putting my recycling in neighbors bins so I don’t get targeted by the gun control squads coming to take my weapons and ammo ‘for my own safety.’ I tell ya, it gets harder every year to justify living in this burg.
To: NPR, the Strib, Alondra Cano, and every other Twin Cities liberal that’s spent the lasdt six months romanticizing the NoDAPL “pipeline” protest
From: Mitch Berg, Ornery Peasant and actual North Dakota native
Re: Just Curious, Here
You all – media and political figures alike – have spent the past six months romanticizing the “No Dakota Access Pipeline” protests more thoroughly than a Scarlett Johansson cheesecake photo shoot.
NPR / MPR? You had your reporters out in the wilds of south-central North Dakota, doing your best to make the protests sound like an organic grassroots phenomenon, sprung up from the soil to protect the river. Y’know – the Missouri. The river that flows through middle of the Dakotas and Nebraska.
Of course, while your reporters (yours too, Strib) plead “It’s Settled Science” on many convenient issues, you ignored it over and over again on this issue. It’s a simple fact – while the oil that powers your Subarus does indeed have some risk of spilling in its remote location far from any major population center, it’s many orders of magntitude per barrel lower that that same risk the way the oil is currently transported – by truck and train, through the middle of Bismarck, Jamestown (blocks from my father’s house, actually), Fargo, Fergus Falls, Saint Cloud, Minneapolis, Saint Paul, Madison and Chicago. As in astronomically more safe.
But let’s not pretend that Alondra Cano knows the first thing about statistics, or cares a rats ass about a bunch of white, rural, Trump-voting North Dakotans’ safety (or, for that matter, how many Strib or MPR reporters could name the river the “protesters” are “protecting”). And your logical consistency about the oil that powers your cars and buses and printing presses and transmitters is no less dubious than about where your food comes from. Yep, same place.
In fact, let’s forget the logical and moral inconsistency of your entire story – you media figures’ selective and incurious reporting, you politicians’ illiterate grandstanding. Ignore it all for now.
There are roughly 200 vehicles down there at last count, ranging from cars and pickups to rental trucks. We’re going to have a very drastic situation trying to keep these vehicles from getting into the river – what everybody’s been trying to protect from day one. We can’t leave them there. We don’t know what kind of biohazard is going to be produced with all the fluids or any other garbage that’s inside the vehicle.
Here’s a Bismarck TV station’s report:
So – for six months you, the Twin Cities’ left leaning media and grandstanding left-wing politicians, romanticized the NoDAPL “protests” and “protesters”.
Just as you did “Occupy”, and the RNC protests , and the various G7 protests, and every other “protest” you can imagine (except the Tea Party, naturally).
And just like every protest other than the Tea Party, the NoDAPL “protesters” left behind filth and squalor.
And they left by the banks of the river they were supposedly “protecting” – cars full of fuel, human waste, and over a thousand tons of general trash. All right there, waiting for the next Missouri River flood.
This, mind you, in a part of the state that is very sparsely populated even by North Dakota standards – miles down a two-lane road from Mandan. Not the wealthy exurbs from which most of you media and political figures hail.
Oh, yeah – and it’s upstream from the Standing Rock reservation.
So – if you’re not running stories about the squalor left behind, and – this is for you, Alondra Cano – actively soliciting people and money and other resources for cleaning up after the people you encouraged to leave the mess, you’re not only hypocrites…
To: Our Bobbleheaded Overlords
From: Mitch Berg, Irascible Peasant
Re: “Fight For Fifteen!”
From a friend of this blog, here’s where the $15/hour minimum wage leads, inevitably and inexorably:
It’s at Seattle/Tacoma International Airport – an early adopter of the #FightFor15 – in case you were wondering. Photo courtesy Brian Skon.
Let me just take a moment to say, I don’t think the “#FightFor15” has anything to do with raising worker wages, or taking any sort of care of the little guy. If it were, you’d be fighting for the only sustainable minimum wage there is – widespread prosperity
No. This is about virtue-signaling to your base (and I don’t mean minimum wage earners) and showing small business who’s boss.
We’ve fallen a little behind on our World War I series. Over the next few weeks/months, we’re going to work to get caught-up to the calendar.
It was well after midnight on December 29th, 1916, but the staff of the Yusupov Palace in St. Petersburg was preparing for a party.
The Palace’s wine cellar had been temporarily redecorated for their expectant visitor. Furniture and carpets had been moved in, along with a gramophone playing “Yankee Doodle” on a continuous loop. Several bottles of wine had been set aside for the occasion, in addition to a variety of sweet petit fours. The number of attendees were unknown – only a few key members of Russia’s nobility and their assistants would later amid to being present. The host, Prince Felix Yusupov, was attempting to entertain his guest of honor – Grigori Rasputin. Yusupov had sought out the supposed “mad monk” weeks earlier to attempt to learn some of the controversial holy man’s healing techniques.
What followed was a mixture of partial facts blended with mysticism and politically-motivated exaggeration. Popular legend states that Yusupov fed Rasputin treat after treat laced with potassium cyanide to no effect. Re-interpretation suggests that one of the night’s conspirators, a doctor, couldn’t violate his Hippocratic Oath to poison the famed mystic. Reality suggests the food was either never poisoned or was administered before being baked, evaporating the cyanide in the process.
After an hour, an exasperated Yusupov had tired of playing guitar and listening to an increasingly drunk Rasputin. The Prince would retrieve his gun and, according to his testimony years later, “a shudder swept over me; my arm grew rigid, I aimed at his heart and pulled the trigger.” Rasputin was seemingly dead – only to reanimate himself and stumble out the door where he kept moving despite four more shots. Only a following head shot supposedly slayed the infamous corruptor of the House of Romanov.
In reality, Yusupov’s first shot had passed through Rasputin’s mid-section without major damage. One of the Prince’s co-conspirators, politician Vladimir Purishkevich, had fired multiple times at Rasputin and connected only once – a bullet to his spine. The body was dumped in the Malaya Nevka River with such haste that one of Rasputin’s galoshes was stuck in the bars of the bridge. Unsure of how to react, the participants dismissed the police sent to investigate the gunshots heard at the Palace, only to re-invite them back to brag about killing Rasputin…all the while insisting the officers keep the incident quiet.
Grigori Rasputin had been an enigma in life – his role in Tsarist Russia a subject of heated debate then and now. In death, the man from the Siberian Plain would become a legendary indictment of Russia’s nobility and government in the First World War.
The truth of Rasputin is difficult to uncover – many “facts” of his life have later been proven false. Allegations abound as to his behavior and influence over the Romanovs
By the winter of 1916, St. Petersburg had become a national paradox – the seat of government for Tsarist Russia, yet a capitol increasingly void of political power.
Tsar Nicholas II had long since left the capitol for Moghilev, some 400 miles away, after appointing himself Commander-in-Chief following the Russian army’s rout in the summer of 1915. Left behind in St. Petersburg to manage the domestic affairs of state were Nicholas’ wife, the Tsarina Alexandra, and a deeply divided State Duma with little actual authority. Continue reading →
The students are, of course, from China, and are parroting the chanting points given to them by their Communist government back home.
Ignorant students trying to shut down free speech by people that people “above” them in the progressive hierarchy deem dangerous. We’ve just described not only the entire campus protest movement, but most of the campuses themselves.
Ted Mondale and Michelle Kelm-Helgen resigned from the Metro Sports Utilities Commission yesterday, after the corruption in the MSFC’s use of luxury skyboxes as a spiff for the Twin Cities’ DFL became to great for even the Metro old-boy-and-girl network to hush up.
Mondale and Kelm-Helgen faced cascading criticism and scrutiny since the Star Tribune reported in November that they and other MSFA commissioners hosted friends, family and well-connected DFLers at two 18-person luxury suites at the stadium during Vikings games and at several concerts. The two said the state-owned suites were needed to market the building, but an investigation by Legislative Auditor James Nobles revealed the suites were used mostly for entertainment by the MSFA commissioners and staff.
The Legislative Auditors report sounds like it’s good reading:
[Legislative Auditor James Nobles’] 100-page report faulted Kelm-Helgen and Mondale’s leadership of the MSFA, saying they had violated a core ethical principle by using public office for personal gain, by handing out free tickets, VIP parking, food and drink to friends and allies.
Combined, the two made nearly $300,000 in taxpayer-funded salaries. They oversaw construction of the $1.1 billion stadium, which was funded in part with a $498 million public subsidy.
And the saga of Michelle Kelm-Helgen, DFL grandée extraordinaire, sounds like a “how-to” for any political glad-hander in a one-party city;
Even before the suite usage blew up, an unclear division of duties between Mondale and Kelm-Helgen became an issue. Former authority members Duane Benson and John Griffith had questioned the need for two taxpayer-funded executives in similar roles. They also raised concerns about Kelm-Helgen’s lack of collaboration.
“We were on a board that had an inability to get information,” Benson said, adding that Kelm-Helgen also refused to let the board participate in her job reviews.
Remember way back when Zygi Wilf was yanking the DFL-led Legislature and Governor Flint-Smith Dayton around, threatening to move the team if the state didn’t pony up to improve his investment for him at public expense? And we asked – what could possibly go wrong when you entrust half a billion dollars to an bunch of unaccountable bureaucrats whose sole qualification was their DFL political connection?
That . . . or the Obama administration faked the numbers and only now are the true numbers coming out. Nobody wants bad economic news; but I’d rather have real bad news than fake good news. But that’s not the real meaning of this story, here’s the deeper meaning:
The Federal Reserve during most of 2016 refrained from raising rates too quickly for fear of interrupting a fragile recovery but has taken a different view of the likely course of monetary policy in 2017, citing “uncertainty” as any expansionary fiscal policies from President Donald Trump have yet to take shape.
In other words, the Deep State and Quasi-Government wonks are Liberals who held down rates when they thought it would benefit Democrats in the election, but now intend to torpedo Trump any way they can. One of the easiest is to “discover” rampant inflation so they can jack up interest rates to fight the rampant inflation they’ve suddenly discovered.
Higher interest rates will panic consumers, kill housing, stifle growth, and mushroom debt service on The Light Bringer’s 20-Trillion Debt. Shifting dollars to debt service will kill the possibility of a realistic budget and doom The Wall.
Liberals and Never-Trumpers will then proclaim it’s all Trump’s fault, except for the parts that are Bush’s fault.
There’s a reason the Establishmet is, well, established.
Recently, a series of phony social media accounts, and a phony job posting, have appeared for a “Draft Jacob Frey for Congress” committee. Frey is, of course, the extreme-extreme-liberal city councilman who is challenging extreme liberal mayor Betsy Hodges in the upcoming Minneapolis mayoral race.
Turns out it all came from someone in her campaign; Hodges’ campaign manager blames “an intern”.
She delivered an “apology” yesterday:
“It happened. I did not know about it until it was brought to my attention, and when it was I immediately took action to remedy the situation,” Hodges wrote on Facebook. “That is not the kind of campaign I choose to run nor the kind of person I choose to be. I extend my apologies to [Council Member] Frey and his team for the incident and will work to make sure nothing like that happens from my team again.”
Hodges said she learned of the fake posting Monday night from Contreras, and told campaign staff that if something like this happens again, someone will lose their job.
“I communicated to my team, with vehemence, what my values are, what my expectations are about how we operate, that this falls outside my values, and that if it happens again the result will be termination,” she said.
Translation: it was no intern. It was someone on her team.
As Sarah Janecek notes – show us the intern.
(And as Janecek points out, that intern had better be making $15 an hour. If they exist. Which they do not).
Connecticut’s governor Dannell Malloy is proposing quadrupling fees for carry permits, as well as raising fees for background checks by 50%:
As part of his budget, Malloy is proposing to increase the state portion of the pistol permit fee from $70 to $300. He also is proposing the cost of the initial 5-year pistol permit fee from $140 to $370.
The increase in fees for gun owners will bring in another $9 million to the state annually, according to the governor’s budget estimates.
Additionally, Malloy is proposing to increase background check fees from its current $50 to $75.
Malloy has, of course, been merely the latest of a series of liberal governors that have spent the last couple of decades turning Connecticut – a state that is home to four of America’s wealthiest cities, a place that by all rights should be financially well-set – into a fiscal basket case, a green fiscal Detroit, a place with the highest per-capita state debt in the country, with a business climate that under decades of stultifying Democrat rule has gone from one of America’s best states for business to the very, very bottom of the pile.
His idea to balance his $3,7 billion deficit? Raise about $9 million in fees for shooters, thereby making it harder for the poor to protect themselves.
Almost no one is buying the Clinton title, co-authored by Devi Sridhar, a Global Public Health Professor at the University of Edinburgh. It currently stands at No. 74,374 on the Amazon Bestsellers Chart.
The book profiles global health organizations and the work they do. Chelsea is Vice Chair of the Clinton Foundation which prioritizes improving global health.
Published by Oxford University Press, the book is well-intentioned but bland in the extreme. And there is no answer given to the question “Who Runs the World and Why?”
In related news, “the Peter Principle” may soon be re-named “The Chelsea Principle”.