My Conversation With Every Single DFLer, Part II

September 5th, 2010 by Mitch Berg

The conversation below is “Fake But Accurate”, and reflects things said – to me and otherwise – by DFLers in a variety of media over the past week or so.  I have synthethized those conversations into a single, “composite” character, whom I’ll nickname “EVERY DFLer” for clarity.

Don’t try this if you’re not an English major.

SCENE:  A coffee shop.  MITCH is sitting at table drinking black coffee.  EVERY DFLer walks by drinking an organic mo-chai-frapp-iato, recognizes MITCH.

EVERY DFLer: (Hisses).

MITCH:  (Notices ED):  Hey, what’s up?

EVERY DFLer:  Tom Emmer doesn’t have a plan!

MITCH: Of course he does.  He just hasn’t released it yet.

EVERY DFLer: That means he has no plan! HAHAHAHA!

MITCH: Well , no.  It means that he’s saving the plan for the campaign homestretch.  Because until sometime between Labor Day and Election Day, the only people who really care about politics, especially specifics of things like “plans”, are wonks, “journalists” and political junkies.  All releasing a plan right before people actually give a crap does is give the DFL time to frame it before any actual voters – including undecideds actually give a hoot.

EVERY DFLer:  Yabbut, Mark Dayton has a plan!

MITCH: Right.  And it’s full of holes and union swag and at the end of the day doesn’t even solve the problem it is putatively designed to deal with [Note:  the link goes to my "Dayton Dustbowl" category, which will be the subject of about ten posts on Tuesday - Ed.]

EVERY DFLer:  But he has a plan!  Emmer doesn’t!

MITCH:  Oh, I think you can count on seeing a plan starting to come out any day now.

EVERY DFLer: Yeah, but it’s not out now!  It doesn’t count!

MITCH: So when Emmer does come out with a plan, your entire attack falls flat…

EVERY DFLer:  No!  Because Emmer doens’t have a plan!

MITCH: But when he does come out with his plan…

EVERY DFLer:  Emmer doesn’t have a plan!

MITCH: But when he does come out with his plan…

EVERY DFLer:  Emmer doesn’t have a plan!

MITCH: But when he does come out with his plan…

EVERY DFLer:  Emmer doesn’t have a plan!

MITCH: But when he does come out with his plan

EVERY DFLer:  Emmer doesn’t have a plan!

EVERY DFLer:  Emmer doesn’t have a plan!

EVERY DFLer:  Emmer doesn’t have a plan!

MITCH: OK, let’s try a different tack, here. Let’s say, hypothetically, that a candidate – let’s call him “Ron Bremmer” – comes out with a plan to cut spending and hold the line on taxes, maybe even cut ‘em, while re-engineering government so that it doesn’t eat up every nickel in overtaxation with frivolous spending when the times are good, like the DFL and the old, RINO MNGOP did from 1968 through 1992.  What then.

EVERY DFLer: …

MITCH:  Well?

EVERY DFLer: …

MITCH: It’s a hypothetical question.

EVERY DFLer: …

MITCH:  What would you do?

EVERY DFLer:   Your a racist who hates immigrants and gay people!

MITCH: No, I’m not.

EVERY DFLer:  Target!  Trigg Trigg Trigg Trigg!  Best Buy! What about the children?!?!

That pretty much covers it.

UPDATE:  Schwoops – someday just came!  Tomorrow, Emmer is reportedly unveiling the first part of his plan.

Stay tuned.

Chanting Points Memo: The DFL Morale Booster!

September 5th, 2010 by Mitch Berg

The New York Times publishes a morale booster for the DFL, a week after the MPR/Humphrey Institute poll showed the Minnesota Gubernatorial race a dead heat.

The analsysis – from “Five Thirty Eight”, a left-leaning statistics blog run amok (without mentioning anything about “Lies” and “Damned Lies”, for some reason) says Mark Dayton has a 78% chance of winning the gubernatorial election; they claim the current stats point toward a 46-41 Dayton win on November 2.

The DFL Chanting Point Bots are duly repeating that “78%” figure as if it is the be-all and end-all of the story.

They’re ignoring the part where the sausage gets made.

Look at the polls they select for their sampling.

The sample gives full weight (”.99″) to an August 2 Survey USA poll that came out about a week before the DFL primary.  When the DFL was outspending Emmer 16:1, and flogging their astroturf campaign against Target to maximum effect.

It gives 2/3 weight (”.66″) to last week’s MPR/Humphrey Institute poll, which showed the race a dead heat.

It gives .4 credit to the un-creditable Strib/”Minnesota” Poll, which showed a ten point Dayton lead, and a tiny little fringe of weight to Rasmussen and Survey USA polls from earlier this summer that showed Emmer inside the margin of error and long before Dayton started his orgy of spending on his slime campaign.

In other words, the stats that the DFL and media are  jumping up and down and caterwauling about could hardly be better cherrypicked to show Dayton in a commanding lead; they are, to say the least, a misleading sample given a questionable weighting.

Take this number seriously at your own risk.

I Heard It On The NARN

September 5th, 2010 by Mitch Berg

Yesterday during the final Northern Alliance broadcast from the MN State Fair, I referred you to a slew of websites:

Stuck Among Stupid Insufficiently Curious

September 5th, 2010 by Mitch Berg

Having the most interesting – read “depressing” – discussion with a couple of DFLers.

Bobby Jindal is coming to the Twin Cities to raise money for Tim Pawlenty.

Lefties:  ”So was Bobby Jindal an “Anchor Baby?”  The GOP wants him sent home when they repeal the 14th Amendment!”

Er, geniuses?  Jindal was born in Baton Rouge; his “home” is here.  His parents, Amal and Raj Jindal, were *legal* immigrants.  They followed the rules.  Jindal is not an “anchor”, since his parents intended to stay here all along.

Idiots.  I’m surrounded by idiots.

Fair Enough

September 4th, 2010 by Mitch Berg

Today, the Northern Alliance Radio Network brings you the best in Minnesota conservatism from 9AM-3PM, live (mostly) for our final day from the Minnesota State Fair!

  • Volume I “The First Team” -  Brian and John are off on assignment  - so Kevin Ecker and Brad Carlson will be filling in from 11-1.  They’ll be doing their usual combination of eating contests and guest interviews; tune in!
  • Volume II “The Headliner”Ed is off on assignment, so I’ll be following 1-3PM Central.  We’ll have Dan “Doc” Severson, Chris Barden, Mark Martin,and perhaps a few unexpected guests…
  • The King Banaian Show! - King is on from 9-11 on AM1570, Business Radio for the Twin Cities!  We’re broadening the franchise; two stations, now!
  • And for those of you who like your constitutionalism straight up with no chaser, don’t forget the Sons of Liberty, from 3-5!   The Sons will also be live at the Fair!

(All times Central)

So tune in to all six hours of the Northern Alliance Radio Network, the Twin Cities’ media’s sole guardians of sanity. You have so many options:

  • AM1280 in the Metro
  • streaming at AM1280’s Website,
  • On Twitter (the Volume 2 show will use hashtag #narn2)
  • UStream video and chat (at HotAir.com or at UStream).
  • Podcast at Townhall, usually by Monday
  • Good ol’ telephone – 651-289-4488!
  • And make sure you fan us on Facebook!

And, this week and next, live at the MN State Fair, on Dan Patch two doors west of Cosgrove, just inside the Snelling Avenue entrance, next to the O’Gara’s “booth”!  Click here for a Google Map!

Join us!

The Dayton Dust Bowl: When The Well Goes Dry

September 3rd, 2010 by Mitch Berg

The Minnesota Public Radio/Humphrey Institute “Poligraph”feature did provide some thorough fact checking on Dayton’s income tax proposals and found they came up short on revenue.

The report called Dayton’s plan to raise $4 billion from raising taxes “wishful thinking”; the plan doesn’t account for the fact that people with money will likely change their behavior to pay less taxes.  People react in their own best interests, generally; it’s human nature.  Even DFLers.

That leads, of course, to an ever-expanding game of fiscal cat and mouse; the “rich” – all those cops and teachers and pharmacists and entrepreneurs and mid-level business analysts – work harder and harder to shift money out of taxable status, which causes less revenue to come in, which further drops the revenue projections, which requires the state to further lower the definition of “rich”.

It was, of course, beyond the MPR/HHHI scope to calculate exactly how short the projections will actually fall.  The fact is, Dayton himself thinks one needs a “supercomputer” to figure it out; he hasn’t figured it out either.

You Start Wearing Blue And Brown

September 3rd, 2010 by Mitch Berg

Mark Dayton demanded that GOP trackers start wearing uniforms.

That’s not the kind of challenge you put in front of Derek “Chief” Brigham from Freedom Dogs.

He’s got 12 potential designs.  My favorite:

Check ‘em all out here.  Details of the challenge here.

It’s actually a contest put on by the MNGOP.  Contenders will be unveiled Labor Day morning at the MNGOP booth at the State Fair.

Might juuuust have to show up for that.

The Dayton Dust Bowl: Grossly Adjusted Waffles

September 3rd, 2010 by Mitch Berg

Dayton has changed the rhetoric on his tax plan and now claims the $130,000 for individuals and $150,000 for couples was adjusted income, not gross income.

I’m being charitable when I say “change”, by the way – on this blog, I busted Dayton a few weeks back, contradicting his own website, in a piece aptly entitled “Blowing Sunshine Up Minnesota’s Skirt”.

All those fact checkers who’ll be queuing up to go over Tom Emmer plan, which should start coming out in the next week or so, would never allow this type of flip flop (or fumble? We may never know!) to go unnoticed. Why hasn’t Dayton added this important clarification to the budget plan on his website? (PDF file)

And here’s a question: I’m presuming Dayton’s assumptions about revenues were based on the original statement – that it was based on gross income, rather than adjusted income.  How does that change that $4 billion figure that Dayton claims the state will extract from those “rich” cops, nurses, programmers, pharmacists, entrepreneurs…

…and all the other families who have the misfortune to have worked hard and earned a decent living?

If There’s One Thing…

September 3rd, 2010 by Mitch Berg

…you can count on in Minnesota politics, it’s that the Twin Cities media will keep an eagle eye on…

…Republican candidates’ kids.

Did Mark Dayton fall off the wagon in the past two years?  How severe are his alcoholism and depression?  How far down will Dayton have to push his definition of “the Rich” to close the deficit, and what’ll be the opportunity costs of doing this in the middle of a terrible recession?

Who the hell knows?  Not Minnesota’s voters!

Because the media can’t spare a few moments from “covering” a 20 year old careless driving conviction and a 20 year old kid’s stupid college drinking photos.

Thanks, KARE11!  Keep scouring Facebook.  You truly do Know What Matters™.

It’s Official

September 3rd, 2010 by Mitch Berg

“Recovery Summer” is now turning into “Failure Fall“.

By all means, Dems; raise taxes.  Turn the screws on all us working people just a little harder.

Here’s Another Prediction

September 3rd, 2010 by Mitch Berg

Florida will see the biggest slime-attack of its entire history…

…against Jennifer Carroll.

Carroll, a native of Trinidad, a retired Navy Lieutenant-Commander, a mother of three, an immigrant from Trinidad, and a conservative, is Rick Scott’s new running mate on the Florida GOP gubenatorial ticket.

Oh, yeah; she’s of African descent:

“Jennifer Carroll is the embodiment of the American dream. She came to America as a young girl, decided to serve her country with the United States Navy, pursued a higher education, started a small business, and then was elected the first African-American female Republican in the Florida Legislature,” said Scott, who launched a new website featuring his new running mate (www.ScottCarrollforFlorida.com).

“Her conservative principles are in line with mine, and this fall we will present a clear choice between conservatives with business experience and a plan to create 700,000 jobs and liberal Obamacrats who want to bring the failed Obama agenda to Florida,” Scott said in a statement to his supporters.

Ms. Carroll looks to be a very, very sharp candidate.

Look for a Democratic smear campaign painting her as stupid, unaccomplished and, most likely, racist; look for at least one “Auntie Tom” reference from a C-list pseudo-celebrity.

She’s the thing the left fears most; an apostate.

(Via E-Mo)

Not To Say…

September 3rd, 2010 by Mitch Berg

…that Michele Bachmann draws a crowd or anything, but this was the scene yesterday…:

…at the Patriot booth when the Representative did an interview with Michael Medved.

Yep – it’s cameraguys from all three of the local TV stations, pressed up against the glass.

By the way – in case you missed it, I’ve upped my prediction of Bachmann’s eventual margin of victory, from 8 to 10 points.

Headline Writers: Retire Now.

September 3rd, 2010 by Mitch Berg

Because the headline you’ve all been waiting all your careers to write has been written.

It’s all over.

The Dayton Dust Bowl: Now We’re All Rich!

September 3rd, 2010 by Mitch Berg

If you are an above average nurse and police officer, or a couple of modestly-successful project managers, or an airline mechanic and a school teacher, or a business analyst and a modestly-successful sanitation equipment salesman, or whatever combination of hard-working Minnesotans you can imagine that are making a combined $150,000 a year, your taxes are going up.

We use the term “average” advisedly;  when Margaret Anderson Kelliher asked Mark Dayton why he wanted to raise taxes on a nurse and police officer, Dayton replied that the average nurse and police officer do not make enough money to reach his definition of “rich.”

So above average nurses and cops and anyone else making $130,000 per year – you need to pay your “fair share” to the government.

And by “Fair Share”, that means when you and your spouse – or you alone, if you’re a fairly successful computer programmer or project manager or small-but-hardworking intrepreneur, or a cop that works lots of overtime and security gigs, or a nurse that picks up a bunch of extra hourly shifts – are going to take a big, nasty hit when you creep above that $130K income line.

Whichever one it is.

And that’s on top of all the nasty hits you’re going to get after January 1 from the Feds.

So keep plugging away, Minnesota.   I’m sure the state will appreciate all that hard work.

The Dayton Dustbowl

September 2nd, 2010 by Mitch Berg

Almost eighty years ago, the Great Plains – where I was born, a generation later – were pummeled by back-to-back catastrophes.  The first one, the Great Depression, was manmade – a deflating credit bubble whose effects were exacerbated by government intervention in trade (the Smoot-Hawley tariffs, which indirectly crippled farm exports) and the market (the entire New Deal, whose price controls had unintended consequences that rippled through ag markets for generations, as well as land management practices that exacerbated the later Dust Bowl) that kept the Depression going long after it would have healed itself after 1929.

The second was natural – an epic drought.  Either would have been bad enough – and either would have been bearable on its own.  Together, the two sets of circumstances – an unavoidable natural disaster and an avoidable man-made one – combined to create an epic human cataclysm, perhaps the worst in American history other than the Civil War.

Minnesota doesn’t face that exact level of gravity today – but the idea is the same.  Our state faces an epic disaster that’s out of our state government’s direct control – the Great Recession, in whatever form it eventually takes.

And we face the “plan” from one of our candidates for Governor – a man-made disaster that, combined with unavoidable circumstances, will be an epic disaster for Minnesota’s economy.

The Mark Dayton budget plan will, for the Minnesota economy, usher in an epic economic Dust Bowl.

Unlike the Dust Bowl of Steinbeck novels and Guthrie songs, California is sending the problem rather than providing a destination.  The Mark Dayton budget will institutionalize all of the same problems that are gutting the California economy – and that of Greece – right before our eyes.

The media is asking no questions of Mark Dayton about his budget; they’re saving all their energy, apparently, for Emmer’s plan, coming out over the next few weeks.

So it’s up to us.

Starting tomorrow – a long, involved series on Mark Dayton’s “Minnesota Dust Bowl” plan.  I’ll be doing what the media won’t; dissecting the Dayton plan, point by point, piece by piece, and spelling out its impact on you, the citizen.

Load granny on the back of the truck; Shot In The Dark is where all us Okies will be going.

How The Hell Does Emmer Win This Thing?

September 2nd, 2010 by Mitch Berg

Let’s make no mistake about this; I’m predicting Tom Emmer is going to win this fall’s gubernatorial race.  It’s going to be tight – 3-4 points, very likely less – but he’s going to win.   On the chance – heaven forefend – that he doesn’t?  In the wake of Jesse Ventura and Al Franken, Minnesota will have proven itself a fundamentally un-serious people for all time to come.

But I have more faith in the people of this state than that.

Still, there’ve been some of my fellow Republicans – that is to say, Republicans, as opposed to conservatives – cracking under the pressure of the campaign.  I’ve talked with a few otherwise-stalwart GOPers who aren’t sure that Emmer can pull this off.

I am sure he can and will.  But let’s break it down.

Here’s how Emmer wins this election:

Endure: Dayton’s family and cronies have subjected Emmer to the most expensive, slimy smear campaign in the history of Minnesota politics.  And yet, according to the latest MPR/Humphrey Institute poll, Emmer is tied, inside a fairly generous margin of error, and plenty of undecideds in a year with a huge tailwind for the right conservative candidates.  He’s stood up to it well, taking a consistent high road – knowing, I suspect, that behind all the slime, Dayton’s really got nothing.

It’s gotta be hard, sitting and acting like a punching bag for a bunch of dirtballs like “Alliance for a Better Minnesota”.  But eventually even bags of slime empty out.  And while the people of Minnesota have long shown a capacity for electing the shamefully bizarre – Ventura, Franken, even Perpich – these mood of the voter is not as dissipate as it was in 1998, and there’s no way Franken would have won without the Democrat tide in 2008.  All that remains, then, is to fill in the vacuum.

With what?

Be Tom Emmer: I’ve been saying it for three months now; when people meet Mark Dayton, they walk away feeling…weird.  On the other hand, when people meet Tom Emmer, even opponents get won over by the guy; if not by his policies, then by his energy and personality and regular-schnook bonhomie.

More importantly – much much more importantly?  When I first encountered Emmer the Candidate about a year ago, in a couple of radio interviews I did with him as both a host and a panelist, I noticed he has a gift that is exceedingly rare among partisans on the right or left; the ability to address a room full of people who don’t start out agreeing with him, and getting them to at least consider what he was to say.  It’s the same gift Ronald Reagan had; the ability to move people from “the center” over to him.

And it shows; in the gubernatorial debates I’ve seen, Emmer has mopped the floor with Dayton and Horner; Dayton comes across as a mumbling, skittery, dissipated professor; Horner, a PR flak who forgot his talking point sheet and is going from a very short list of lines he remembers.

Which is why I suspect you won’t see all that much media coverage of this year’s debates; Emmer, in person, is a dynamo.  The more people know and see that, the better he does.

The Plan:  The left has dusted off an old chanting point.  Last June, they were demanding to see the specifics of Emmer’s plan.   They’ve been doing their best to frame a plan whose details they know very little as yet about.  The chanting points, on the blogs, Twitter and the Strib, are growing increasingly desperate; “Where is it?  Since we haven’t seen it, it must not exist!  It’s probably just tax cuts!  That did SO well so far, didn’ t  it?”

The pace of the framing is picking up because the DFL knows it’s out there.  And, with the likes of Annette Meeks and the rest of Emmer’s policy crew working on it, it’s gonna be a doozy.

What’s in it?  I dunno.  I’m not on the campaign.  Never have been.  Oh, I can speculate – indeed, next week, I will.  In great depth.

But everyone from Emmer and Meeks on down to lil’ ol’ me knows this is the game-maker – and the game-breaker, potentially.  In a year that is more friendly to government reform than any in history, The Plan will be Emmer’s opportunity to throw Dayton and his pathetic “tax the rich” ( who make over $130,000 a year) plan on defensive for good.  A chance to show that there’ll be a grownup at the helm.

It’s a huge chance.

Like all huge chances, it could break good, or break bad.  My bet is on “good”.  Overwhelmingly so.

And that’s what the DFL is betting on, too.  It’s why a candidate like Dayton – rich, with 100% name recognition and “experience” – needs to throw such an incredibly slimy campaign, and call in so many markers from the media to insulate him.

As I noted in my original piece on the subject, Emmer is right to wait on releasing The Plan.  He’s going to be outspent three or more to one, to be sure – but the race, and most of the talk about it, so far has been among the wonks and the political junkies.  And all of them made up their minds about the time I did.

But The Plan should impact right about the time the people who really matter – the undecided voters – start to realize there’s an actual campaign going on and that they should pay it some attention.  And that window starts to creak open in about the next couple of weeks.

Take Back “Miracle”:  This is the big one, as far as I’m concerned.

It was forty years ago that the DFL stole the term “Miracle”.  The “Minnesota Miracle” was huge expansion of the Minnesota economy; it was accompanied by the institution of a huge government wealth-redistribution plan designed to subsidize poorer parts of the state with money from the then-wealthy Twin Cities.   It’s been presented over the past forty years as if the redistribution program caused the blooming of Minnesota as a business, educational and population center, as if Minnesota – a place blessed with immense resources and 150 years as the transportation, commercial, social and demographic hub of the entire north-central United States – would have remained a desultory backwater forever without “Local Government Aid”.

The fossils of the “Miracle” have been perverted over the years into a money-laundering scheme to help the DFL-dominated governments in the Twin Cities and Duluth hide their spending.

This is the “Miracle” at 40.

Emmer realizes, rightly, that there needs to be a new “Miracle” in Minnesota – one that puts government back in its proper role, and otherwise stays out of the way of Minnesotans’ natural industry and energy.

That’s the right message in this day and age.

No matter how much mindless flak the other side puts up.

Just So We’re Clear On This

September 2nd, 2010 by Mitch Berg

I do believe Mark Dayton taught high school.

I believe it because it’d be grindingly stupid for a public figure to lie about something that is as relatively easy to run down (even given New York City’s sclerotic bureaucracy) as whether he actually taught.

And even if Mark Dayton were unaware of how nothing remotely public is secret from The Cloud – and it’s possible, since the last time he ran for office there were no blogs, and The Cloud and crowdsourcing were the stuff of futurists’ jabberings – he’s got people on his staff who, by all accounts, should.

So yeah, I suspect Dayton probably taught for a couple of years.  Because he put his teaching experience in his bio for a reason – to burnish his “I understand the plight of the commoners” cred, which might be suspect, given his plutocratic pedigree.

So yes; I’ll accept Dayton worked as a teacher.  But I’d be interested in knowing where.  And with whom.

Charlie Quimby has a quote from the director of the “Peace Corps”-like program for whom Dayton worked, right out of Yale in the late sixties.

Mark taught on the Lower East Side where my headquarters were located. He was one of the first to come into the program, along with a number of recent Yale graduates, and I knew him quite well. He did a very good job and the conditions were in some ways more demanding than the Peace Corps.

It is indeed contemptible that anyone would attempt to claim that Mark did not teach in the New York City public schools or deny his youthful idealism.

In other words, “shut up, madding peasants!”.

Still, we’re getting closer.  Dayton taught on “the Lower East Side”.  Quimby even intimates that he taught at a “PS65″, on the Lower East Side.

Well bully!  Now we’re getting closer!

But so far what we have is the word of a training program director, and a copy of his license that was apparently delivered to…the address of the training program.

Look – as I’ve said, I believe that Dayton taught.  And as the grandson, son and brother of teachers, I do truly want to “deny his youthful idealism”, heaven forfend.  Teaching is an important job; if he actually was a teacher, it improves my opinion of him ever so slightly (and, commensurately, if he is, heaven forfend, lying about it, it’ll certainly tank whatever respect I may have had for him, little as that may be).

So would it kill Dayton to simply say “I taught for two years at PS65; my principal was Lev Abramowiec”, or wherever?

Because what we have so far are…:

  • Dismissive huffing from an educational “community organizer” who assures us that Dayton taught for his program, but doesn’t apparently go into details.  In the spirit of inquiry, I’ll ask anyone to stop me if I’m wrong.
  • A copy of a teachers license delivered, apparently, to the address of the program above.  A teachers license proves that someone was deemed qualified to teach, and that they passed their student teaching evaluations, and a bunch of classes in pedagogy and psychology (”Theory of the Eraser 351″, my dad – who only taught for forty years so, plus a couple stints teaching teachers – called ‘em).

Well, it proves that Mark Dayton could have been a teacher, all right.  It doesn’t actually put him in a classroom, but I’m sure that’s just a formality.

So would it kill the campaign to give us a school name?  A principal?

Quimby signs off by saying he really, really doesn’t like uppity peasants asking questions of their betters:

If you find something factual that refutes me [which would be difficult, since the only facts in the linked piece are the one-time existence of a lower-east-side school], please do get back to my readers in the comments. I’ll be in Turkey, where that nation has an election that may move it every closer to democratic rule.

Otherwise, it would be a good idea not to raise questions when you really don’t know the answers.

It makes you look like an ass.

Sometimes it surely does.

And sometimes it leads to other questions, which lead to bigger answers than you’d ever dreamed.

Read the rest of this entry »

This Is Your Immigration Policy

September 2nd, 2010 by Mitch Berg

¡Arizona es i occupado!

The federal government has posted signs along a major interstate highway in Arizona, more than 100 miles north of the U.S.-Mexico border, warning travelers the area is unsafe because of drug and alien smugglers, and a local sheriff says Mexican drug cartels now control some parts of the state.

But by all means, Left – keep blurring the distinction between legal and illegal immigration.  It’s done us so much good so far.

Miller’s Crossing

September 1st, 2010 by First Ringer

Alaska’s GOP Senate nominee starts his quest to ask voters to “look into your heart”.  Senate Democrats may start asking contributors to look into their wallets.

It had all the looks of an epic recount slugfest.  Narrow margin of victory.  A near blood fued between the waring factions.  Lawyers from Washington.  Instead, Alaska’s GOP primary battle royale ended with a whimper, not a bang:

Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska conceded late Tuesday in her Republican primary race to Joe Miller, a lawyer from Fairbanks backed by Tea Party activists, Sarah Palin and other conservatives…

Ms. Murkowski’s concession followed the counting of about 16,000 additional ballots on Tuesday, which left Mr. Miller with a lead of about 1,469 votes out of about 103,000 cast. Several thousand more votes were to be counted on Friday but the trend suggested Ms. Murkowski would not gain enough ground to win.

Despite fumbling her re-election bid worse than Joe Pisarcik and entertaining a variety of ways to get onto the November ballot, Lisa Murkowski decided – at least for the moment – not to further risk the odds of a Republican holding her seat come November.  That hasn’t stopped Murkowski from sidestepping an endorsement of her primary bête noire.  And from the looks of yet another early poll, Joe Miller could use the support as Rasmussen has Democrat Scott McAdams within 6%:

Rasmussen Alaska Senatorial Survey

  • Joe Miller (R) 50%
  • Scott McAdams (D) 44%
  • Other 4%
  • Not sure 2%

Favorable / Unfavorable {Net}

  • Scott McAdams 43% / 36% {+7%}
  • Joe Miller 50% / 44% {+6%}

To call McAdams’ post primary fundraising Lazarus-like would imply his financial efforts had once been alive.  But since Murkowski and Miller headed to extra innings, Democrats in the lower 48 states have been slowly funneling McAdams coffers – thus far to the tune of just over $77,000.  Such figures might help in the 173rd “largest” media market in the U.S., but McAdams may be fighting his own internecine battle with state and national Democrats who are hinting at trying to replace him with more established names like former Governor Tony Knowles or former Lt. Gov. Fran Ulmer.

More likely, Alaska will be witnessing two AAA candidates battling in the political majors, egging on by activists from both sides.   Neither party’s senate branch is likely to pour resources into Alaska; the DSCC even moreso if McAdams remains on the ticket as they simply can’t afford to expend resources with so many vulernable incumbents.  But that hasn’t stopped conservative and liberals activists from trying to throw gas on the cooling embers of the primary in an effort to stoke interest and donations.  Consider the race the defacto Tea Party vs The Daily Kos battle of the frozen tundra.

But Joe Miller’s biggest opponent isn’t Scott McAdams but – depending on which numbers you feel matter more – either the 40% of Republicans who say they have an unfavorable opinion about him or the near 50% of Republicans who voted against him.  To that effect, Miller needs to keep Tea Party interest in his campaign brewing lest the coffers run dry, especially as he attempts to bridge the divide between his supporters and Murkowski’s. 

Could Murkowski torpedo the entire endeavor and endorse McAdams?  Sure, but doing so would stain the entire Murowski legacy in Alaska and all but formally ensure that Lisa Murkowski’s political career truly ended on primary night.  Murkowski’s relatively quick concession at least shows enough political acumen to suggest she’s still interested in surviving to fight another day.

Question For Teachers

September 1st, 2010 by Mitch Berg

My impression is that having a license to teach in a state means one has…:

  • taken (and presumably passed) the state-mandated series of education courses from an accredited college or university education program
  • practice-taught a state-required amount of time with a regular teacher
  • Applied for and gotten the license.

What am I missing here?

Stolen Fervor?

September 1st, 2010 by Mitch Berg

My dad taught high school – writing, English and especially Speech – for close to forty years.  He taught in two districts – Rugby and Jamestown, ND.  It’s not hard to prove it; everyone in Jamestown either had dad, or their kids did, or their parents did.  There were not a few two-generation families of students in that town.

Of course, you could ask him about it.  He’ll probably tell you all you wanna hear.  He’s kinda proud of the work he did.  Justifiably so.

Any good teacher should be!

So yesterday, Sheila Kihne at Activist Next Door noted that her Freedom Of Information (FOI) request to the NYC School District came up with no record of a Mark B. Dayton having been employed there forty-odd years ago.

Now, it could be that the bureaucrats reponding to the FOI request did their perfunctory least to answer Sheila’s question.  It could be that someone typed “Mark V. Dayton” instead of “Mark B. Dayton” into a computer.  It could be, as a commenter on Sheila’s post noted, that the forty-year-old teacher records aren’t on the computer yet.  It could be that, being civil service employees in the most sclerotic bureaucracy east of Chicago, they really don’t give a rat’s ass.

But Mark Dayton could settle this right now; we know he’s not above settling the things he wants to settle – he just released his NY teaching license, which at least proves he went to college and got certified.  Yay!

That’s how easily he could shut down those who are asking the questions about his classroom time.  It’d take about five seconds.  Just tell the world – where did he teach, and when?

Because a teacher should be proud of the work they did.

Chanting Points Memo: Polls Apart

September 1st, 2010 by Mitch Berg

While Pauline Kael, the doyenne of American film critics, passed away years ago, her syndrome is alive and well here in Minnesota.

Yesterday’s MPR/Humphrey Institute poll, which showed Mark Dayton and Tom Emmer in a dead heat, drew a chorus of “bad methodology!” from the local leftysphere; none of their friends, after all, voted for Emmer!

Jeff Rosenberg at MNPublius says the methodology just can’t be right, because it didn’t poll enough latté-guzzling hipsters:

The poll was based on a “landline, random-digit dial survey.”

Landline? Are you kidding me? I wonder how many younger voters were missed. Not having a landline, I could never have been contacted for this poll.

Perhaps.  The first time I heard this excuse was 2004, when an earlier generation of leftybloggers – Chuck Olson, if memory serves – swore that the polls were undercounting John Kerry supporters because “…I don’t know anyone with a landline, all my friends use cell phones”, too.  I don’t know how much weight to put on this; most people still do have landlines; the younger crowd that may not have ‘em is also less likely to vote than the general population.  And MPR says they thought of this: “The survey data has also been weighted to accomodate for factors such as the number of telephone lines, cell phone usage, gender, age, race and ethnicity to approximate the demographic characteristics of the state’s population according to the Census”.  Did MPR and the HHHI do a good job of compensating?  Time will tell.  As an Emmer supporter, I certainly hope so.

Rosenberg:

Maybe that helps to account for the poll’s likely-voter model:

Republican: 46%

Democrat: 41%

Independent: 13%

You’ll have to excuse me if I don’t buy that. The oversampling of Republicans is yet another reason to suspect that this poll overstates the extent to which the race has actually narrowed.

Only if you have become accustomed to a diet of “Star/Tribune Minnesota Polls”, which tend to poll “registered voters”, who are less likely to vote.

The MPR/HHHI poll is likely voters.  Republicans are energized this year; the Tea Party is turning out conservatives in a way Minnesota and the rest of the nation hasn’t seen since 1994.  I’ve seen not a few Dems complain that the DFL usually tops the GOP in voter ID in Minnesota.  This is a fact – among registered voters and random respondents.  Among likely voters – people who will go to the polls come hell or high water?  That number varies widely.

How widely?  Let’s go back to 2006.  The GOP was reeling and groggy; the DFL was on a roll.  And in October of ‘06 the state broke down at 48% DFL, 37% GOP,  13% Independence Ventura Party, and 2% everyone else.

We know how that turned out; Pawlenty held on by the skin of his teeth. The GOP lost all the other Constitutional offices, and lost control of the Senate.  Gil Gutknecht got sent packing; Michele Bachmann won by only 8% against a weak candidate in a solid red district that’ll send her back to DC with a two-digit majority this year.

Now – were there 11% more Democrats than GOPers throughout the entire population of Minnesota?  Of course not.  But among those that were planning on going out to vote, there was a pretty serious DFL majority.

The leftyblogosphere seems to think it’s unthinkable that the tables have turned.

Mr. D covered it as well, on his blog and on the MinnPost:

You can look at this a number of ways. Here are a few things I’d suggest:

  • Dayton and his minions (and I would include Matt Entenza in that collection) have spent millions of dollars demonizing Tom Emmer all summer long, with very little response from the Emmer camp. If the best they are able to do is get a tie, that doesn’t bode well for Dayton.

That’s the part that’s gotta be keeping DFL strategists up all night; after running the most expensive sleaze campaign in Minnesota history, they’re way inside the margin of error.

  • There’s no point in pretending that Emmer’s campaign hasn’t had a few hiccups up to this point. The tip credit flap was an unforced error and he’s been slow to respond to some of the calumnies that have been heaped upon him thus far. While it’s good to see him starting to respond now, his passivity has been puzzling and often maddening. It’s not what we saw in the primary.

I figured that this was about “keeping the powder dry” until the final kick, the last six weeks before the election where the undecideds’ decisions really get made.  I figured Emmer was saving his big plan for cutting spending and re-engineering state government until it’d do him some good; I have solid reason to believe I’m right.

Emmer’s been absolutely scrupulous about running a clean campaign; when Ed and I interviewed him this past Saturday, he insisted he doesnt’ refer to Mark Dayton and the DFL as “the opposition”.  That’s idealism for you.  It’s also swimming against the tide of sleaze that “Alliance for a Better Minnesota” has unleashed.  Will it work?

We’ll see.

(In the meantime, he’s got us bloggers and talk show people for the rough stuff…)

  • The current economic conditions in Minnesota aren’t as dire as they are in, say, Nevada, which has allowed Dayton to run the sort of campaign that would have been laughed off elsewhere. That could change, though. One thing worth remembering is that many voters will start seeing the first fruits of Obamacare in October, when they get the bad news about their insurance premiums going up. That won’t help the standard-bearer of the party that is responsible for these increases.

And that – the emerging reality of the Demcrats’ tax debacle, and the true price tag of Dayton’s insane plan – along with Emmer’s actual plan, when it impacts (and we are in the home stretch), is going to be a huge game-changer.  Properly presented to Minnesota, it should leave Dayton stumbling around like a cow that’s been stunned.

Finally, Joe Bodell from Minnesota “Progressive” Project:

If it takes an 8-point oversample in Tom Emmer’s favor to get him up to a tie, I feel pretty great about Mark Dayton’s chances in a real electorate in which younger, cell-phone-only voters show up.

Except Bodell is comparing apples (likely voters) with axles (out-of-date registered voter ID numbers).  Does the poll oversample GOP voters?  Perhaps, but Bodell wouldn’t be able to quantify it with the numbers he’s using.

But aside from the weird methodology, check out the published crosstabs:

1. Independent voters:

Undecided: 38%

Horner: 26%

Dayton: 23%

Emmer: 13%

There’s a lot of room for movement there, but there is virtually no way Emmer picks up significant enough ground among independent voters to make a dent in the overall results. Keep in mind that this is a mid-term election, and the non-partisan vote is generally going to be a lot lower than it is in presidential years, so given a normal partisan breakdown…

That’s all textbook conventional wisdom.  But many, many independents that stayed home in 2002 or 2006 are looking at their tax bills and health insurance today, and making plans for November 2.  Which group of ‘em is more likely to show up?

2. The gender gap: MPR’s writeup indicates that there’s no significant gender gap — that women are currently favoring Mark Dayton by a similar margin to men favoring Tom Emmer. However, what they fail to mention directly is that the sample includes 52% women (about normal for Minnesota) which is yet another built-in advantage for Dayton. Again, given a more reasonable partisan sample, this will go straight through to the final results of this election.

Let me shorten that: “Given that MPR took a legitimate sampling of women, and a sampling error I can’t really quantify, I’m crossing my fingers”.

3. Age gap? MPR doesn’t appear to have published the support breakdowns by age, only the sample sizes — which look weird in and of themselves, since it’s a decent bet the senior vote will be bigger than this poll indicates.

I’m lost; did MPR not publish the breakdowns, or did they just publish senior numbers?

Look – this is going to be a tough race for Emmer.  There’s never been any doubt about it.  He’s fighting a 3:1 financial disadvantage, and a big, powerful political machine with 100% name recognition in a blue state.  He’s fighting against the most scabrous, truth-free smear campaign in Minnesota political history.  He’s the underdog.

All he’s got is a tailwind of revulsion with Obama, a very weak (and possibly potemkin) opponent, a soon-t0-come plan, and his own skills as a campaigner.

Even seems fair, so far.

Documenting The Climate Of Hate

September 1st, 2010 by Mitch Berg

One of the left’s favorite shrieking points – like a chanting point, but delivered in an insistent, high-pitched, angry squeal – was that the right, especially the Tea Party, was/is involved in delivering an “avalanche of violence” upon their opponents.

But any sort of detailed investigation shows that, in fact, the prohibitive majority of political violence in this country is left-on-right.

One of my many small projects has been to create a page – an online museum, if you will – commemorating each act of left-on-right violence in recent years.

For purposes of this page, “violence” is defined as physical violence resulting in injury or death, and property damage at a felony level.

And I’m going to throw it open to you, the audience, as I give the Shot In The Dark Climate of Hate” page its formal debut.

Please send me any examples of significant left-on-right political violence in the past decade.  Remember – injuries and/or felony property damage. Links are appreciated – unlike the left, we on the right need to substantiate our accusations.  I’ll give you credit (unless you disclaim it) in the museum.

Dayton’s School Daze?

September 1st, 2010 by Mitch Berg

Sheila Corbett Kihne from the excellent blog “Activist Next Door” did something nobody else in the Twin Cities media seems to feel the need to do; she started asking questions about Mark Dayton’s biography:

Mark Dayton’s current website biography reads:

After college, I taught 9th grade general science for two years in a New York City public school. It was the toughest job I’ve ever had!

Sheila thought she’d do a little simple fact-checking, and sent a “Freedom of Information Act” request to the New York Public Schools:

This was my request (in addition to standard template language for a FOI request)

Please email the following records:

confirmation of employment of:

Mark B. Dayton (birthdate 1/26/47) by the New York City Dept of Education/NYC Public Schools

dates of employment (believe them to be approximately July 1969-July 1971)

job title at the time of employment

school of employment

home address during the period of employment

The NYC Dept. of Education came back zilch; Sheila has scanned the NYCDOE’s response.  Follow the link and check it out.

Now, it’s quite possible that Mr. Dayton never took a salary while teaching, however there would still be some record of his employment. Why doesn’t the NYC public schools have any record of Mark Dayton working there when he says he did?

With an insanely left-leaning Minneapolis media establishment– with long-standing ties to the Dayton family– it’s unlikely that any will bother to ask Mark Dayton about it nor likely that this post will make any news.

I’m certain it’s just a bureaucratic snafu.

Perhaps the Dayton campaign could release some sort of documentary evidence to put this to rest?

Stuff From The “Draft” File

August 31st, 2010 by Mitch Berg

So much stuff in the hopper; so little time to finish it all.

But there are a few things in the works here that I thought I’d mention – partly to “tease” it, partly because posting it makes me feel committed to getting it all done.

How The Hell Does Emmer Win This Thing?: Not really a question – Emmer’s going to win, probably by 3-4, which isn’t to say Republicans and conservatives don’t have a huge order ahead of us.  But how’s he going to win it?  I have some ideas.

Making The Cut: How Minnesota can fix the budget problem without destroying the state economy.

Requiem For An Old Radio Station: Too hard to explain.

The Return Of “Things I’m Supposed To Love, But Can’t Stand” / Things I’m Supposed To Hate But Like Anyway”: One of my favorite features from last year, I have a fresh wave of incongruity coming up shortly.

World War II: Fact And Myth: I won’t give out any spoilers, though.

What The Hell Do We Do About The National GOP?: Pretty self-explanatory.  Might take longer to finish than the WWII series…

Stay tuned!

--> Site Meter -->